ARMY NEWS
Comments (5)
I wonder how long it will take before they figure out that the weapon won't work? Soldiers won't be able to engage targets at 600 yards in combat, it has too much recoil, our allies won't adapt the caliber, major fubar!
Edward Randall at 9:46 AMI believe the NGSW program is a waste of money. The rifle is no better than the FN SCAR or Designated Marksman rifle already in service. We could save a lot of money by using the composite case ammunition from true velocity in 7.62 and the current rifles. The suppressor on the NGSW is not needed. Rifle fire location systems such as the Boomerang use the shock wave from the projectile to locate the point of origin. The fire locator could still locate our troops with suppressors on the rifles unless the projectile is subsonic.
Edward Randall at 10:08 AM@Brian Foley - the use of the new ammunition was actually well thought out and rather clever. Virtually every weapon which will use the 6.8mm ammo can be quickly re-barreled for 7.62 or 5.56. Yes it is a new supply line, but the overall increase in higher velocity (for less wind and gravity correction as well as better penetration and lethality) are an upgrade level not seen since about the time of Vietnam. We can't move forward if we cling to the past.
Johnathan Galt at 2:56 PM
1.) I wonder if it would be possible to replace the brass part of the Sig-Sauer case with a combustible part of the cartridge like the new German 130 mm main gun for their proposed new Main Battle Tank? This way maybe they could make the combustible part of the cartridge a little slower burning than the rest of the cartridge so that the bullet would be propelled by the same or little slower initial impulse but for a longer period of time. This way one might be able to attain a equal or higher velocity for the same size bullet or an equal velocity from a bigger bullet. Just a thought.
2.) I wonder if H&K could make a 468 version of their 417 weapon with better recoil mitigation?
It doesn't matter what I think or say, the Army has decided on the 6.8mm round and that's that. Of course it'll screw up the overall logistics picture. The other services will now have to at least consider going to the 6.8mm round or settle for having different supply chains. This also pretty much puts an end to cross services familiarization, seeing as all of our NATO partners use either 5.56mm, 7.62mm or 7.62 X 39mm ammunition. The idea of cross training and weapons familiarization meant something when everyone used the same rounds but now, well it wasn't all that important. The XM5 and XM250 are both fine weapons, but the way the Army is rolling this out is a big mistake.
Brian Foley at 11:43 AM