AIR POWER
Comments (8)
Gripen does not have the fuel capacity to be useful in the Pacific Theater. F-111 (and F-14s) were mechanically complex aircraft and difficult to maintain (and their TF30s, ew...). The F-15EX is an excellent derivative of a proven design. The USAF should acquire more than 144 units.
CA at 10:11 AMThe F-15EX is an excellent complement to air interdiction for multiple reasons. The F-15EX has a greater range, is 1.6 times as fast as an F-35 and can carry up to 22 air-air missiles. Coupled with actual missile mules, like the Boeing Wingman, and the stealthy F-35 with sensors galore.
Edmund at 9:04 PM
The use of F-15 and other "legacy" fighter/bombers as follow-on for stealth aircraft is pretty much "settled doctrine". But in thePacific theater with the advent of large hypersonic missiles the new F-15 EX carrying those missiles will likely be in the first wave and absolutely require unmanned (and hopefully stealthy) escort aircraft for protection.
You can buy two still quite capable F-15EXs for a single F-35, and the basic airframe/engines/etc. are proven, have an available stockpile of spares, and a base of trained and experienced maintainers. We forget that Stalin had a point in his comment about quantity having a quality of its own - in real combat, we expect to take losses, and each loss does less degradation to capability if you have more platforms. With fatigue issues impacting the availability and performance of the F-15 fleet, the US is in serious need of replacing those airframes, and that can be done cheaper and faster with the F-15EX than with F-35s - and with lower operating costs which frees up funds for even more aircraft. This problem is aggravated by the stupid and narrow-minded decision in the 1990s to limit the F-22 run to under 200 airframes.
"Stealth" capabilities are time limited- the F-117 was in combat service less than a decade before opponents started figuring out how to defeat its stealth capabilities, and we can probably expect no better from current generations - the advantages of stealth capabilities on the F-35 can be expected to be seriously degraded before the full run of the platform is even delivered.
An alternative, of course, is to also look at the JAS.35 Grippen C, which is a fully NATO-compatible, non-stealth but reduced radar signature 4.5 generation fighter with rough field capability and low operations and maintenance costs. Of course, that choice is politically precluded due to the influence on the Pentagon and Congress wielded by the US aerospace firms.
@Trisaw, I believe the preferred phrase is, "Missile Mule."
Johnathan Galt at 1:36 PM
The purpose of the PLA-AF J-20 is twofold. Anti ship missiles, disruption of USAF tankers which they see as a major Achilles heel in US air supremacy in the western Pacific.
The Saab Gripen-C is "NATO certified" like a Su-37 is. They both support the common NATO analog bus published in 1974 in the event a NATO aligned country wanted to import their craft. All modern NATO craft use a digital combus. If you need that from Saab, you will have to look at the Gripen-E. Saab is currently working on a "Growler" version of the E (as reluctantly offered to the Swiss) and as long as the JAS-39 cannot deliver a nuke, it will always lose to either the SupeHornet or F-35. The Eurofighter will not get its nuke abilities for another 2 years according to EADS.
This all makes logical sense in that the US and NATO have the newer and better systems to remedy the deficiencies due to aging systems that are getting outclassed and outdated.
Fielding the F-15EX in INDO-PACOM is the idea to have the F-15EX act as a "weapons truck" by having 22 AAMs to remedy the small internal AAM payload of stealth fighters. Working in tandem, the F-15EXs should make up for the loss of external-carried AAMs. Furthermore, with Quicksink JDAMs, the F-15EXs can deter shipping.
At times, it would really pay to have two engines, Mach 2+ speed, two pilots, and one of the largest nose radars around to help with the fight, even if non-stealthy.
Just break down and design an upgraded version of the FB-111. Longer range and better ability to carry lots of weapons.
AkronMike at 5:05 PMMay the era of the medium range bomber return to the Pacific!