BUDGET

Troop Level Decision Adds to Fiscal Burden

9/1/2016
By Jon Harper
President Barack Obama’s decision to keep more troops in Afghanistan longer than previously planned could come with a hefty price tag and lead to another budget battle with lawmakers.

The commander in chief abandoned his plans to cut U.S. troop levels in Afghanistan to 5,500 by the end of this year. Instead, he will keep 8,400 there into 2017 to train and assist Afghan government forces, and conduct counterterrorism missions.

“The security situation in Afghanistan remains precarious,” he said in July when he announced his decision.

Obama’s move may require a significant amount of additional funding.

The marginal cost of deploying troops in Afghanistan has averaged about $1.2 million per year per service member, according to Todd Harrison, director of defense budget analysis at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. If that trend continues, keeping an additional 2,900 troops there through fiscal year 2017 should cost about $3.5 billion, he said in an email.  

Before Obama revised his plans, his administration requested $59 billion for overseas contingency operations funding in fiscal year 2017.

“His budget does not have room for the troops he is committing,” House Armed Services Committee Chairman Rep. Mac Thornberry, R-Texas, said in a press release after Obama unveiled his decision.

“The White House must submit a supplemental funding request to accommodate troop levels in Afghanistan immediately,” he said.

Harrison said there is  “a good chance” that Obama will submit one in the coming months.

A spokesperson for the White House Office of Management and Budget said the Obama administration is assessing the cost of the additional troops.

“Together with the Department of Defense, we are actively looking at funding needs related to the revised force posture,” the spokesperson said in a statement provided to National Defense. “In the coming months and into the fall, we will work with Congress to ensure the necessary funds are available.”

A decision to submit a supplemental funding request — which, as of press time, has yet to be made — would be “consistent with the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 by adhering to the principle that any increase in [federal] funding must be shared equally between defense and non-defense” agencies, the spokesperson added.

The White House’s position could lead to another political standoff with Republicans who are looking to beef up the Pentagon’s budget without giving more money to other departments.

Topics: Budget

Comments (0)

Retype the CAPTCHA code from the image
Change the CAPTCHA codeSpeak the CAPTCHA code
 
Please enter the text displayed in the image.