|
ARTICLE
January 2003
Washington Pulse
by Elizabeth Book
Czech Republic’s Chem-Bio Unit in Kuwait
An elite 250-man military unit from the Czech Republic, specializing in nuclear,
biological and chemical (NBC) weapons defense, is on the ground at Camp Doha
in Kuwait. The unit is participating in training and exercises in conjunction
with Operation Enduring Freedom, said a Czech diplomat in Washington.
The specialty of the unit is consequence management, said Vratislav Janda,
deputy chief of mission at the Czech Embassy. “They are special troops
like [the U.S. Army’s] Green Berets,” he said.
NBC defense has long been a niche specialty of the Czech armed forces. The
Czech military’s NBC units were deployed in the same region during the
Gulf War in 1991.
A member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, the Czech Republic is part
of a cluster of Eastern European countries freed from communist governments
following the collapse of the Berlin Wall in 1989. In recent years, it has not
upgraded its weapon systems to become interoperable with U.S. and other NATO
weapons systems, and instead has focused on downsizing its Soviet-era forces
and weapons system, said Janda. The Czech military plans to complete its reduction
from 120,000 to 35,000 soldiers in 2006, and will close 100 of its 150 outdated
military outposts within the next several years, he said.
The Czech’s foray into niche specialization is indicative of a growing
trend in European military policy, as they figure out ways to work with the
United States in military coalitions.
Marines Tell Suppliers They’ll Be Treated Better
The chief of the Marine Corps Systems Command recently told contractors that
it’s time to stop “whining” about how badly SysCom treats
them.
“We have a reputation that SysCom is hard to deal with,” said Brig.
Gen. William D. Catto, during an industry conference in Arlington, Va.
Catto said he is not particularly proud of that reputation and wants to make
mends with unhappy suppliers.
Following are the top complaints Catto has heard since he became SysCom commander
last July:
- Contracting officers are difficult to communicate with, and make the process
too complicated.
- Contractors don’t often know the “go-to” guy.
- There is a hostile anti-industry environment.
- SysCom officials “stiff-arm” industry.
- There is a culture of keeping industry at a distance.
- Small businesses don’t get a fair opportunity.
“I am not going to tell you that none of that is true,” said Catto.
But he promised contractors that he would work to reverse the negative perceptions
about SysCom and that he and his staff would make an effort to devote more time
to meet with industry representatives.
Assistant Commandant Gen. William J. Nyland told the conference that the Corps
wants more “partnering” with industry. But it goes both ways, he
said. The Corps, he said, needs high-quality suppliers, as much as the industry
needs contracts to stay alive.
Former Polish Official: Military Reform Is Slow
Although Poland was admitted to NATO in 1997, it has been slow to modernize
its armed forces, said a former Polish defense official. Radoslaw Sikorski,
director of the New Atlantic Initiative at the American Enterprise Institute,
in Washington, D.C., was previously deputy defense minister in Poland’s
first democratically elected government in Poland. At a recent press briefing
in Washington, he discussed the need for the countries of the former eastern
bloc to invest in weapons systems.
“Ten years ago, we spoke about a fundamental slimming down of the armies,
so as to spend more money on equipment, buying modern aircraft for our air force,
various other things,” he said.
“I’m sorry to say that 10 years on — in other words, after
twice the length of time of the second World War, it still hasn’t been
done,” he said.
Part of NATO’s accession agreement stipulates that NATO countries must
invest at least 2 percent of their GDP on defense and weapons system. However,
internal parliamentary disputes as well as lagging economies in Eastern Europe
have slowed spending.
Having to wait 10 years for the decision on buying a plane is not acceptable,
he said. “I’m just embarrassed, quite frankly.”
JSF Will Be Expeditionary, Says Aviation Chief
At a recent industry meeting held by the Navy’s International Programs
Office, Lt. Gen. Mike Hough, deputy commandant for Marine Corps aviation, explained
some of his goals for the Joint Strike Fighter program, including his hope that
it will enhance expeditionary maneuver warfare. But he also espoused the idea
that the Joint Strike Fighter should be a high-performance, low-maintenance
vehicle.
“What we’re trying to do with this airplane is make it like your
car,” he explained. “When you turn the key it will work, at least
98.8 percent of the time.”
Hough relayed a recent conversation he had with then-commandant of the Marine
Corps Gen. James Jones, who just became the U.S. supreme allied commander Europe.
The two discussed the fact that new Jaguar sports cars coming off the assembly
lines today don’t need oil changes for at least a calendar year. The goal
with the Joint Strike Fighter, he said, is to develop an aircraft that has similar
characteristics. “We want it to go on and stay on, with very little support,”
Hough said.
For the U.S. Defense Department, the Joint Strike Fighter is intended to be
“the model acquisition program for joint service and international cooperation,”
said Air Force Maj. Gen. John Hudson, the program’s executive officer.
Hudson’s goal is “to develop and produce an affordable next-generation
strike fighter weapon system, and sustain it worldwide,” he told the Navy
International Programs Office conference.
Among the program requirements for the fighter is short take-off and vertical
landing capabilities, Hudson said. Other key performance parameters are improvements
in the area of radio frequency signatures, combat radius, sortie generation,
logistics footprints, mission reliability and interoperability.
Back To Top
|