|
ARTICLE
January 2003
Those Who Defend Us…
by Lawrence P. Farrell, Jr.
Just after the conclusion of World War I, the seeds of what became NDIA were
planted to address the abysmal military preparedness with which U.S. forces
entered that conflict. To this day, our purpose remains to advocate for a strong
industrial base and to ensure that the highest quality systems are placed in
the hands of our fighting men and women.
As the beat of the war drums grows louder, perhaps it is appropriate to contemplate
the second part of that mission, reflecting for a moment on the needs of “those
who defend us” and their special contribution to our security.
In this regard, it is important to remember that the defense of the country
is the responsibility of every citizen. In our democracy, we have developed
a unique approach to that responsibility—the all-volunteer force.
Consequently, all of us—and especially those of us in the business of
national defense—have a responsibility to feel connected to those men
and women who put their lives on the line to protect us. The importance of that
connection becomes obvious when one has a family member in the service. Those
who don’t, nonetheless, need to remember that our volunteer force is made
up of special people, in whom we all have a stake.
Much of what the average citizen learns about ongoing or emerging military
operations comes from inside-the-Beltway pundits and TV talking heads. Some
of it is good, but much is off target, and the short 30-second to one-minute
bursts turn the debate about war into an oversimplified intellectual exercise,
which often badly misinforms. Most often the misinformation is focused on topics
such as the effectiveness of air power or the size of the ground force that
would be needed to invade Baghdad. Sometimes the discussions mischaracterize
or overlook the service of the troops.
Nearly three years ago, when the United States was conducting a war against
Serbia, the talk shows often would debate the merits of sending ground forces
into Kosovo. In one particular instance, one journalist commented that dispatching
ground forces likely would result in “lots of casualties.” The rebuttal
from another journalist went something like, “...but we must remember,
they are volunteers.” The journalist seemed to be saying that the blood
of a “volunteer” is somewhat less precious, because he or she had
chosen to serve.
Needless to say, that outrageous comment made my blood boil. And I was at a
loss to understand its intended meaning.
The all-volunteer construct has had many positive features and outcomes, such
as a more professional, effective and stable military force. Unfortunately,
some people have come to believe that only “those other folks” have
the responsibility to defend us. A gap has developed between ordinary citizens
and our professional military, because the average citizen is not required to
participate in defense, unless one volunteers to do so. We need to close that
gulf by continually reminding everyone that every citizen has ownership in this
enterprise.
The lives of each and every soldier, sailor, airman and marine should be viewed
as precious by our entire citizenry—regardless of whether one has served
in the military or not. We should feel a bond with them, even though we don’t
know them personally, because they have chosen to defend us all. They are not
just “those guys, who choose to fight.” They are real people.
Last month, the Washington Post published a poignant piece written by the father
of a young Marine, who never had felt any connection to the military or even
had been aware of what the services do, until his son joined up.
“Before my son became a Marine, I never thought much about who was defending
me. Now when I read of the war on terrorism or the coming conflict in Iraq,
it cuts to my heart,” wrote Frank Schaeffer. “My son has connected
me to my country in a way that I was too selfish and insular to experience before.
... If the immorality of the Vietnam War was the only reason those lucky enough
to go to college dodged the draft, why did we not encourage our children to
volunteer for military service once that war was done?”
Schaeffer’s experience gets at the essence of what I’m talking
about. As he contemplates his son’s future as a Marine, he ponders, “Is
the world a safe place? Or have we just gotten used to having somebody else
defend us? ... I feel shame because it took my son’s joining the Marine
Corps to make me take notice of who is defending me.”
During these trying times, when we find the United States confronting unfamiliar
and ever-changing threats, we feel fear and uncertainty, but we also find reassurance
in knowing that our military forces are the best equipped and trained in the
world. If they do have to go into harm’s way, the expectation is that
they will defeat the enemy and come home within a relatively short period of
time.
For that reason, here at NDIA we feel we have a huge responsibility as “the
voice of the industrial base” to make sure the United States can provide
the best equipment and training for our forces. That means, among other things,
having a strong industrial base—both in the government and the private
sector. A healthy industrial base must be supported by both human resources
and robust funding in the R&D and procurement accounts. The engineers, designers
and scientists in our defense industry take a lot of pride in that what they
do will help our troops win the war.
If we go to war, we want to know that, at least, our valiant troops will be
superbly trained and their weapons will be top-notch.
Those who defend us are the best our country has to offer. They are giving
us the best they’ve got. In return, we owe them the best possible weapons
systems, our unwavering support, and perhaps most importantly, our understanding
of the importance of their duty and the sacrifices they and their families make
every day. As Frank Schaeffer said, “they are our heart.”
Please e-mail me your comments at lfarrell@ndia.org
Back To Top
|