Twitter Facebook Google RSS
National Defense > Blog > Posts > Senate Probe Offers New Details on Air Force Acquisition Blunder
Senate Probe Offers New Details on Air Force Acquisition Blunder
By Sandra I. Erwin

A Senate panel concluded that the Air Force wasted more than a billion dollars on a logistics information system largely because it failed to follow existing laws and regulations designed to prevent such flops.

The program, called the expeditionary combat support system, or ECSS, was terminated in 2012 after eight years in development.

The Air Force conducted its own probe of ECSS last year, and conceded that management failures and cultural inertia led to the program's failure. The Senate permanent subcommittee on investigations, at the request of Sen. John McCain, R-Arizona, launched its own inquiry in April 2013 and unveiled its findings this month.

The release of the committee's report coincides with a new bipartisan review of the Pentagon's procurement system
led by the Senate and House Armed Services Committees. Lawmakers and Defense Department officials are studying potential fixes to current regulations and laws to avert debacles like ECSS. At least $50 billion worth of military procurement programs were terminated over the past decade before they produced any usable equipment.

One takeaway from the Senate's ECSS investigation is that programs fail not necessarily because the regulatory structure is flawed but because military buyers simply fail to comply with existing rules. In the case of ECSS, committee staffers concluded, there were guidelines in place to help avert such misfires, but the Air Force ignored them.

"The Air Force failed to adhere to congressionally-directed 'business
process reengineering' principles throughout the ECSS program," the report said.

Business process reengineering is a management strategy used by large organizations to improve efficiency. BPR is mandated by several legislative and internal Defense Department policies to help transition organizations from old methods to more efficient ways of doing business. ECSS was intended to replace more than 200 antiquated information networks with a single, modern system.

"Despite repeated congressional directives to utilize BPR principles when procuring large information technology business systems, the Air Force failed to do so throughout the ECSS program, resulting in cost overruns, scheduling delays and, ultimately, program termination," said the report.

Investigators found that the Air Force did not change its internal business processes, which was a "vital" piece of how it would integrate ECSS into the organization. "In so doing, the Air Force violated many crucial guidelines and best practices for information technology acquisition."

The Air Force selected Computer Sciences Corporation to manage the integration of new Oracle logistics software into the Air Force’s operations, but Air Force managers were unwilling to alter their existing business processes in order for ECSS to succeed, said the report.

The committee warned that other IT procurement programs — such as the defense enterprise accounting and management system — could suffer a similar fate as they are "encountering many of the same problems as ECSS," the report said. DEAMS is behind schedule and over budget by $1.7 billion. 

"Given the importance of programs such as these to the Department of Defense and its overall efforts to transform how it does business, the Air Force and other military departments and defense agencies must not repeat the costly mistakes made in the attempted ECSS procurement," the report said. 

In recent appearances on Capitol Hill, the Pentagon's top procurement official, Frank Kendall, has recognized that IT acquisition faces a steep climb to recovery. “I've spent a lot of time with our program executive officers and our program managers trying to understand the problems that they're seeing,” he told the Senate Armed Services Committee in April.

While the problems are well known, the Pentagon has yet to outline a plan to address them. The Defense Department is under growing pressure to deliver successful information systems — which it relies on for military operations and also for payroll, personnel, logistics management and accounting functions.

Credit: Left, Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich.; Middle, Sen. Jim Inhofe, R-Okla.; Right, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz. (Defense Dept. photo)


Re: Senate Probe Offers New Details on Air Force Acquisition Blunder

ECSS was unfortunately the standard outcome from most large Defense IT programs that follow the waterfall weapon systems acquisition and engineering patchwork called DOD5000 and also uses FFRDC to guide the program.  

Any COTS based modernization program will fail when approached with a design to spec R&D or academic resource.  We are seeing similar outcome with HHS, Army DCGS, DOD Cloud, Army Reddisk, Navy ERP, Army WIN-T, DHS SBInet, FBI Virtual Case File, all of whom following a near identical approach.  More interestingly, each hired the same FFRDC in direct violation of FAR restrictions on using this type of congressionally funded R&D shop.
John Weiler at 9/3/2014 5:33 PM

Add Comment

Items on this list require content approval. Your submission will not appear in public views until approved by someone with proper rights. More information on content approval.

Name: *

eMail *

Comment *



Name: *

eMail *

Comment *


Please enter the text displayed in the image.
The picture contains 6 characters.

Characters *


Legal Notice *

NDIA is not responsible for screening, policing, editing, or monitoring your or another user's postings and encourages all of its users to use reasonable discretion and caution in evaluating or reviewing any posting. Moreover, and except as provided below with respect to NDIA's right and ability to delete or remove a posting (or any part thereof), NDIA does not endorse, oppose, or edit any opinion or information provided by you or another user and does not make any representation with respect to, nor does it endorse the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or reliability of any advice, opinion, statement, or other material displayed, uploaded, or distributed by you or any other user. Nevertheless, NDIA reserves the right to delete or take other action with respect to postings (or parts thereof) that NDIA believes in good faith violate this Legal Notice and/or are potentially harmful or unlawful. If you violate this Legal Notice, NDIA may, in its sole discretion, delete the unacceptable content from your posting, remove or delete the posting in its entirety, issue you a warning, and/or terminate your use of the NDIA site. Moreover, it is a policy of NDIA to take appropriate actions under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and other applicable intellectual property laws. If you become aware of postings that violate these rules regarding acceptable behavior or content, you may contact NDIA at 703.522.1820.



Bookmark and Share