Twitter Facebook Google RSS
National Defense > Blog > Posts > Army Unmanned Aircraft Programs: Winners and Losers
Army Unmanned Aircraft Programs: Winners and Losers
By Stew Magnuson

The declining Defense Department budget, combined with the planned drawdown of forces in Afghanistan, has forced the Army to choose some winners and losers when it comes to the service's unmanned aerial systems.

The RQ-5 Hunter, first flown in combat as early as 1999 in Kosovo, was actually canceled years ago, but the Army kept 20 aircraft around as the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan ramped up. Col. Pat Tierney, director of the Army's aviation directorate, said Dec. 11 at the Army Aviation Association of America unmanned aircraft systems forum, that after troops come home, the Hunter will be divested from the service's inventory.

The Hunter is a long-range UAS originally designed for strategic intelligence, reconnaissance and surveillance missions controlled at the corps level. The Army is now fielding the Gray Eagle, which can carry similar payloads. Meanwhile, the service has moved away from strategic applications for its UAVs in order to concentrate on tactical applications at the division level and below.

The Hunter "was the most successful canceled program in the history of the Army," Col. Tim Baxter, UAS program manager quipped at the conference the following day.

Another loser is the idea of an Army vertical take-off and landing UAV. Talk of the Army acquiring a helicopter-like drone for ISR missions had been ongoing for several years. Army Training and Doctrine Command studied the possibility, but it has now decided that because of budget constraints, the service will have to make do with the fixed-wing unmanned aircraft it already has, Glenn Rizzi, a senior advisor at TRADOC said.

The Army at one time had included two UAVs capable of hovering in its now canceled Future Combat Systems modernization program. One was a large aircraft similar to the Navy's Fire Scout. A second was intended for small units.

Rizzi said the Army sees more potential for an unmanned air cargo helicopter, similar to the one the Marine Corps is flying now in Afghanistan to resupply troops at remote bases. However, there are no forthcoming formal requirements for that concept, he added.

One winner is the Puma, a small hand-launched UAV that small units are using for reconnaissance and surveillance. The Army requested the system under a rapid fielding initiative in 2007 to complement its other small drone, the Raven. Soldiers were demanding an all-weather capable aircraft with longer endurance and a gimbaled camera.

Baxter said the Puma will be transitioning to a program of record.

Attaining such status generally protects programs from budget axes and formally integrates them into the Army. The Hunter never became a program of record.

Photo Credit: Defense Dept.


Re: Army Unmanned Aircraft Programs: Winners and Losers

Regarding your comment on the cargo helicopter that the Marines are currently using, I recommend you read the following:

Marshal Davout at 12/14/2012 10:15 AM

Re: Army Unmanned Aircraft Programs: Winners and Losers

My company (Nostromo) has previously proposed a low cost fixed-wing cargo UAV with a precision delivery system currently designed for loads up to 250kg. Precision is at 10m. The aircrat has two hard points on the wings and plans exist for an internal bay. A simple prototype was demoed to USMC Systems Command in 2005. The intent of these systems is to supply small units or to deliver unattended sensors, for example. Perhaps the Army might have an interest? Frederic Ruiz-Ramon, Nostromo LLC, .
Frederic Ruiz-Ramon at 1/3/2013 6:28 PM

Add Comment

Items on this list require content approval. Your submission will not appear in public views until approved by someone with proper rights. More information on content approval.

Name: *

eMail *

Comment *



Name: *

eMail *

Comment *


Please enter the text displayed in the image.
The picture contains 6 characters.

Characters *


Legal Notice *

NDIA is not responsible for screening, policing, editing, or monitoring your or another user's postings and encourages all of its users to use reasonable discretion and caution in evaluating or reviewing any posting. Moreover, and except as provided below with respect to NDIA's right and ability to delete or remove a posting (or any part thereof), NDIA does not endorse, oppose, or edit any opinion or information provided by you or another user and does not make any representation with respect to, nor does it endorse the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or reliability of any advice, opinion, statement, or other material displayed, uploaded, or distributed by you or any other user. Nevertheless, NDIA reserves the right to delete or take other action with respect to postings (or parts thereof) that NDIA believes in good faith violate this Legal Notice and/or are potentially harmful or unlawful. If you violate this Legal Notice, NDIA may, in its sole discretion, delete the unacceptable content from your posting, remove or delete the posting in its entirety, issue you a warning, and/or terminate your use of the NDIA site. Moreover, it is a policy of NDIA to take appropriate actions under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and other applicable intellectual property laws. If you become aware of postings that violate these rules regarding acceptable behavior or content, you may contact NDIA at 703.522.1820.



Bookmark and Share