Twitter Facebook Google RSS
 
National Defense > Blog > Posts > Budget Cuts Reignite Army, Air Force UAV Turf Battle
Budget Cuts Reignite Army, Air Force UAV Turf Battle
By Stew Magnuson



Dwindling funding may be bringing back a turf battle over which military service should control medium-altitude, long-endurance unmanned aerial vehicles.

The final years of the previous decade saw an inter-service fight, largely driven by senior Air Force officers, who argued that the Army should relinquish control of the its growing fleet of large UAVs. The Army prevailed, arguing that it needed to control this increasingly important capability within its own ranks.

The debate is apparently on again. But this time it is being driven by a budget- conscious Congress.

Col. Pat Tierney, director of the Army's aviation directorate, took a good chunk of his 15-minute speech at the Army Aviation Association of American unmanned aircraft systems conference in Arlington, Va. on Dec. 11 to defend the service's need to fly its own aircraft. There are no duplicative efforts, he insisted.

He made many of the same points his predecessors were forced to make more than three years ago. The Air Force is flying its Reapers and Predators on "strategic" missions and must share its aircraft across all four services. The Army needs its Gray Eagles and other large UAVs for tactical missions.

"The Air Force would come to us and say 'we can probably cover most of those missions with what we've got. There is duplicity there.' I am telling you that is just not true," Tierney said.

The Army has moved away from using UAVs for intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance as the Air Force still does. It is using them for reconnaissance, surveillance and target acquisition, he said. The target acquisition mission must remain in the Army at the division level, he said. If a target is in sight, officers can't wait hours for an Air Force Reaper, which may already be tasked on another mission, to show up.

"There are certain things we have got to be able to do for ourselves," he said.

When asked why he felt the need to bring up the arguments of yesteryear, Tierney acknowledged that the Army is still feeling the pressure to hand over its UAV missions to the Air Force. The office of the secretary of defense understands that the Army needs its own UAVs, he said. Lawmakers don't fully understand this, he said. There are efforts "to limit us," he added.

"We have got to go back up to the Hill and explain what it is we do with this system," he added. UAVs have the potential to sharply decrease the amount of time needed to fly more expensive helicopters, but no one on Capitol Hill understands those potential cost-saving benefits, he said.

A junior officer who serves with Tierney later told National Defense that the turf battle was settled years ago and that senior Pentagon leaders understand that the Army needs its unmanned aircraft for tactical missions. The service is also expeditionary, and can deploy them in theater more quickly than the Air Force. The renewed debate is coming from Capitol Hill, not the Air Force, he said.

Photo Credit: Defense Dept.

Comments

There are no comments yet for this post.
Items on this list require content approval. Your submission will not appear in public views until approved by someone with proper rights. More information on content approval.

Name: *

eMail *

Comment *

Title

Attachments

Name: *


eMail *


Comment *


 

Refresh
Please enter the text displayed in the image.
The picture contains 6 characters.

Characters *

  

Legal Notice *

NDIA is not responsible for screening, policing, editing, or monitoring your or another user's postings and encourages all of its users to use reasonable discretion and caution in evaluating or reviewing any posting. Moreover, and except as provided below with respect to NDIA's right and ability to delete or remove a posting (or any part thereof), NDIA does not endorse, oppose, or edit any opinion or information provided by you or another user and does not make any representation with respect to, nor does it endorse the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or reliability of any advice, opinion, statement, or other material displayed, uploaded, or distributed by you or any other user. Nevertheless, NDIA reserves the right to delete or take other action with respect to postings (or parts thereof) that NDIA believes in good faith violate this Legal Notice and/or are potentially harmful or unlawful. If you violate this Legal Notice, NDIA may, in its sole discretion, delete the unacceptable content from your posting, remove or delete the posting in its entirety, issue you a warning, and/or terminate your use of the NDIA site. Moreover, it is a policy of NDIA to take appropriate actions under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and other applicable intellectual property laws. If you become aware of postings that violate these rules regarding acceptable behavior or content, you may contact NDIA at 703.522.1820.

 

 

Bookmark and Share