Twitter Facebook Google RSS
 
National Defense > Blog > Posts > Hope for House Cybersecurity Bill in Lame Duck Session
Hope for House Cybersecurity Bill in Lame Duck Session
By Valerie Insinna



A new, undisclosed cyberthreat may rekindle the debate on a House cybersecurity bill during the upcoming lame duck session, the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee said Oct. 4.

Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Mich., would not provide further details about the threat, including where it originated, but called out Iran as an unpredictable cyber-actor.

Rogers 
said at a U.S. Chamber of Commerce conference that he has conferred with his counterparts in the Senate about the threat. It would target networks in the United States from “an unusual source that has some very real consequences if we're not able to deal with it,” he said.

As for Iran, Rogers asked whether leadership there will make a rational decision on whether to launch a cyber-attack. “And by the way, I think they’re closer than we would all like them to be to come in and cause trouble in our financial services network.”

The bill, known as the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act, or CISPA, passed in the House in April, but Obama has threatened to veto it even if it passes in the Senate. The administration opposed the bill for failing to protect privacy and allowing companies to be shielded from lawsuits. Rogers was cautious in describing the level of Senate support for the legislation, calling "momentum" too strong of a word choice.

If passed, CIPSA would allow the director of national intelligence to establish mechanisms allowing private industry and the government to share information on cyberthreats. However, groups such as the American Civil Liberties Union have criticized the bill, saying that this level of information sharing would allow the government to have too much private information about consumers.

Cyber Command Commander Army Gen. Keith B. Alexander tried to assuage the fears of businesses that are wary of government regulation.

"We don't need the government in our networks to do this, nor does the government want to be in there, looking in our networks for a whole host of reasons,” Alexander said during a speech. “But somebody has got to tell us where the problem is."
 
He called intellectual property theft the largest transfer of wealth in history and called on businesses to work with the intelligence community to stop the bleeding.

It was a welcome, but not entirely convincing message for industry members who 
in August helped defeat a Senate cybersecurity bill, which Alexander supported. The Chamber of Commerce has criticized the legislation as being too burdensome and costly even though the bill's cosponsors scaled back regulations, making them voluntary instead of mandatory.

Former Department of Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge blasted Congress for inaction. Ridge is currently the chairman of the national security task force for the chamber.

"They [lawmakers] don't need a sense of urgency. They must have it," he said. "In spite of that sense of urgency, there's been little to no effort to build a consensus around the way forward to deal with this critical problem."

The business lobby is more welcoming toward legislation like CISPA, which is voluntary and is seen as sufficiently limited in scope.

Ridge said that government regulations would keep business from coming up with more advanced ways of dealing with the problem, and he touted information sharing as “the piece upon which we all agree."

Photo Credit: Istockphoto

Comments

There are no comments yet for this post.
Items on this list require content approval. Your submission will not appear in public views until approved by someone with proper rights. More information on content approval.

Name: *

eMail *

Comment *

Title

Attachments

Name: *


eMail *


Comment *


 

Refresh
Please enter the text displayed in the image.
The picture contains 6 characters.

Characters *

  

Legal Notice *

NDIA is not responsible for screening, policing, editing, or monitoring your or another user's postings and encourages all of its users to use reasonable discretion and caution in evaluating or reviewing any posting. Moreover, and except as provided below with respect to NDIA's right and ability to delete or remove a posting (or any part thereof), NDIA does not endorse, oppose, or edit any opinion or information provided by you or another user and does not make any representation with respect to, nor does it endorse the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or reliability of any advice, opinion, statement, or other material displayed, uploaded, or distributed by you or any other user. Nevertheless, NDIA reserves the right to delete or take other action with respect to postings (or parts thereof) that NDIA believes in good faith violate this Legal Notice and/or are potentially harmful or unlawful. If you violate this Legal Notice, NDIA may, in its sole discretion, delete the unacceptable content from your posting, remove or delete the posting in its entirety, issue you a warning, and/or terminate your use of the NDIA site. Moreover, it is a policy of NDIA to take appropriate actions under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and other applicable intellectual property laws. If you become aware of postings that violate these rules regarding acceptable behavior or content, you may contact NDIA at 703.522.1820.

 

 

Bookmark and Share