Twitter Facebook Google RSS
National Defense > Blog > Posts > Global Electronics Giant Makes Play for U.S. Defense, Aerospace Market
Global Electronics Giant Makes Play for U.S. Defense, Aerospace Market
By Sandra I. Erwin

U.S. defense and aerospace firms — saddled with inefficient manufacturing operations that dampen profits — could benefit from the lean, mean, production techniques of the consumer electronics industry.

So says Tim Malac, vice president of aerospace and defense at Flextronics, a global electronics manufacturing services company.

Flextronics, the world’s second largest EMS supplier — after iPhone manufacturer Foxconn — sees the defense and aerospace markets ripe for outsourcing, even at a time when outsourcing is a taboo issue in Washington. It also considers the defense market an attractive target despite projected Pentagon budget cuts.

Precisely because of financial pressures on the federal budget and on corporations to compete in the global economy, manufacturers of major weapon systems, satellites, aircraft, and other military and commercial hardware are searching for ways to slash cost and increase productivity, says Malac. The economic case for contracting out manufacturing operations is strong, he contends.

Flextronics, a $30 billion company based in Singapore, is aiming at Pentagon suppliers and commercial aerospace firms that manufacture high-tech components in-house.

“We are looking to provide manufacturing services for major defense contractors, or take over their supply chain,” Malac says in an interview. Companies might not realize the potential cost savings that could be achieved by contracting out manufacturing to commercial firms that have industrial efficiency down to a science.

Even military contractors that are required to assemble their products domestically can benefit from outsourcing, he says. Flextronics, which operates in 30 countries, has several plants in the United States, with its U.S. headquarters in Milpitas, Calif. Its customers include original equipment manufacturers in the consumer electronics, telecommunications and medical device industries.

Malac, a former defense industry executive who joined Flextronics in 2011, says the company today sees aerospace and defense as its “highest growth” sector. “Customers are looking to cut cost, they are rationalizing their portfolios,” he says. Discussions with defense and aerospace industry executives in recent months hint at a growing demand for lower-cost manufacturing, he says.

As part of its foray into the U.S. defense sector, Flextronics in March acquired a California-based electronics manufacturer, Stellar Microelectronics.

Malac says a concerted effort to penetrate the aerospace market began about a year ago when Flextronics senior management reorganized the company and created a “high reliability solutions” group to focus on aerospace, medical and automotive products. This sector caters to customers that are subject to unique requirements and regulations and that generate $10 million or less in sales. “You still get the benefits of our $30 billion operation,” he says.

Contrary to conventional wisdom, commercial firms such as Flextronics are not shunning the notoriously complex U.S. defense business. Bidding for Pentagon contracts tends to scare off some suppliers because of the red tape and a byzantine procurement process.

“That’s how things were,” says Malac. “Things have changed. Companies have seen there’s a lot of value in these markets.”

A large Pentagon “systems integrator” such as Lockheed Martin would be a prime candidate for Flextronics’ services, Malac says. “We could cut their supply chain cost, we could drive cost out of lower tiers. … We have done it in other industries and achieved double-digit savings.”

Growing concerns about network intrusions and use of counterfeit electronics in military systems are seen as a business opportunity to bring cybersecurity know-how into the defense sector, Malac says.

In the electronics industry, companies protect their intellectual property as zealously as the Pentagon safeguards its weapon blueprints, he adds.

Flextronics’ Chief Information Officer David Smoley says EMS firms pour significant resources into protecting data as “we operate in parts of the world that are perceived to be challenging from a security perspective, such as China, Eastern Europe and parts of Latin America.”

Regulations that crack down on counterfeit electronics and other defense-unique rules don’t faze Flextronics executives.

It is not unlike other regulatory challenges that EMS firms routinely must tackle, Smoley says. Environmental regulations are a case in point. Each country where Flextronics assembles electronics puts out a steady stream of legislation, and the company has to continuously adapt, he says. “It’s part of doing business in the global economy: Being aware of legislation.”

The ponderous Pentagon procurement cycle is not a deterrent either, he says. In the global economy, companies are reacting 24/7 to changes in technology. If aerospace and defense customers prefer a slower cycle, that is not a bad thing, he adds. “It gives us more time for planning, more time for testing.”


Re: Global Electronics Giant Makes Play for U.S. Defense, Aerospace Market

While it's true that Flextronics is Singapore-based, its U.S. plants are very productive and rightfully proud of the work they do. The Flextronics plant in Morrisville, NC, hosted our very first "Manufacturing Makes It Real" Network event last year, and they've been stalwart supporters of the MMIR effort to celebrate and advocate for NC manufacturing -- and, by extension, U.S. manufacturing. I wish them tremendous success.

Gray Rinehart at 5/8/2012 1:40 PM

Re: Global Electronics Giant Makes Play for U.S. Defense, Aerospace Market

Notwithstanding the interest of foreign owned enterprises to enter this marketplace A&D firms must look closely at these supplier and new NDAA provisions governing supply-chain to be sure that these firms can meet emerging requirements.  The test isn't just ensuring supply-chain documentation, rather it is proving a device or system hasn't been compromised.  That test is severe, and can only be accomplished if facilities are accessible and subject to routine independent inspection, verification and certification. 

The present state of US and Allied IT security is such that the likes of Sean Henry, Michael Hayden, Leon Panetta and the Chairs of the House and Senate Committees on Armed Services and intelligence have all concluded that re-establishment of security in this space will require its rebuilding using "trusted components and systems. 

To take advantage of this opportunity Flextronics, and other foreign owned enterprises will have to demonstrate a great deal more than cost efficiency to be deemed a credible supplier
Tom Goldberg at 5/9/2012 12:43 PM

Add Comment

Items on this list require content approval. Your submission will not appear in public views until approved by someone with proper rights. More information on content approval.

Name: *

eMail *

Comment *



Name: *

eMail *

Comment *


Please enter the text displayed in the image.
The picture contains 6 characters.

Characters *


Legal Notice *

NDIA is not responsible for screening, policing, editing, or monitoring your or another user's postings and encourages all of its users to use reasonable discretion and caution in evaluating or reviewing any posting. Moreover, and except as provided below with respect to NDIA's right and ability to delete or remove a posting (or any part thereof), NDIA does not endorse, oppose, or edit any opinion or information provided by you or another user and does not make any representation with respect to, nor does it endorse the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or reliability of any advice, opinion, statement, or other material displayed, uploaded, or distributed by you or any other user. Nevertheless, NDIA reserves the right to delete or take other action with respect to postings (or parts thereof) that NDIA believes in good faith violate this Legal Notice and/or are potentially harmful or unlawful. If you violate this Legal Notice, NDIA may, in its sole discretion, delete the unacceptable content from your posting, remove or delete the posting in its entirety, issue you a warning, and/or terminate your use of the NDIA site. Moreover, it is a policy of NDIA to take appropriate actions under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and other applicable intellectual property laws. If you become aware of postings that violate these rules regarding acceptable behavior or content, you may contact NDIA at 703.522.1820.



Bookmark and Share