Twitter Facebook Google RSS
 
National Defense > Blog > Posts > Panetta Touts Pentagon Investments in Green Energy
Panetta Touts Pentagon Investments in Green Energy
By Sandra I. Erwin

The Defense Department sees climate change and rising oil prices as national security concerns, and intends to play a leading role in the nation’s energy future, said Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta.

In a May 2 speech to one of the nation’s top environmental advocacy groups, Panetta championed military efforts to reduce fossil fuel consumption and to boost production of alternative sources of energy.

“We are working to be a leader and a bold innovator in environmental stewardship, energy efficiency and energy security,” Panetta said at a reception hosted in his honor by the
Environmental Defense Fund at the Smithsonian American Art Museum in Washington, D.C.

While the topic of climate change has been hugely politicized in recent years, Panetta cast the issue as a serious security crisis. “In the 21st century, we recognize that climate change can impact national security — ranging from rising sea levels, to severe droughts, to the melting of the polar caps, to more frequent and devastating natural disasters that raise demand for humanitarian assistance and disaster relief,” he said.

Reliance on oil supplies from the Middle East also has significant implications for the U.S. military, which has assumed responsibilities for securing strategic oil choke points such as the Strait of Hormuz and the Strait of Malacca. Analysts have estimated that, since 1980, the Pentagon has spent $65 billion to $85 billion a year protecting Middle East allies and ensuring the flow of petroleum to world markets. 

“The quest for energy will also continue to shape, and reshape, the strategic environment — from the destabilizing consequences of resource competition to the efforts of potential adversaries to block the free flow of energy supplies,” Panetta said. “These strategic and practical considerations weighed heavily on us as we developed our new defense strategy.”

As the owner of 30 million acres of land and as one of the world’s largest energy consumers, the Defense Department has significant environmental stewardship responsibilities, said Panetta. “Our drive to be more efficient and environmentally sustainable has the potential to transform the nation’s approach to the challenges we are facing in the environment and energy security.”

Even in the absence of a national energy policy, the Pentagon plans to pioneer green technology. “We take the long-term view in everything we do, and have the ability to adopt new technologies,” Panetta said.

The Pentagon in fiscal year 2013 is requesting more than $1 billion for efficient aircraft and aircraft engines, hybrid electric drives for ships, improved generators and micro-grids for forward-deployed bases, and combat vehicle energy efficiency programs. Another $1 billion is sought for energy improvements at military installations in the United States. These efforts, Panetta said, will seek to “demonstrate next-generation energy technologies.”

The Army, Navy and Air Force have committed to producing at least 3 gigawatts of renewable energy at their installations in the coming years, which makes this “one of the largest commitments to clean energy in the nation’s history,” said Panetta.

The volatility of oil prices also adds to the urgency of the Defense Department’s energy agenda. The military now faces a $3 billion budget shortfall because of higher than expected fuel costs, Panetta said. “I have a deep interest in more sustainable and efficient energy options.” The Pentagon spent $15 billion last year on fuel for military operations.

On March 9,
Panetta signed off on an ambitious plan to reduce fuel consumption across all branches of the military and to promote energy efficiency as a standard way of doing business. The plan sets seven specific targets for “transforming the way U.S. armed forces consume energy in military operations.”

These battlefield-focused energy initiatives aim to cut back on fuel demand in war zones as supply lines into Afghanistan increasingly have come under enemy attack. There are currently more than 400 U.S. forward-operating bases in Afghanistan that consume from 250 to 7,500 gallons of fuel per day depending on their size. Large bases go through up to 50,000 gallons of fuel per day. Overall, the U.S. military consumes 50 million of gallons per month in Afghanistan.

Panetta’s endorsement of fuel efficiency as a guiding principle in planning wars and building weapon systems has been welcome by supporters of renewable technologies and by energy-security hawks who worry that the United States is too vulnerable to oil supply shocks.

Over the past several months, however, the Pentagon’s green-energy initiatives have run into a wall of opposition from Republican lawmakers, who have questioned the need to spend defense dollars on renewable energy, and have called for more oil and gas drilling in the United States as a means to lower fuel costs.
Congressional objections have centered on military biofuels programs. The Defense Department is seeking $300 million for biofuel research and development over the next five years.

Comments

Re: Panetta Touts Pentagon Investments in Green Energy

The solution to climate change

The primary source of GHG is fossil fuel burning electrical generating facilities. http://dingo.care2.com/pictures/causes/uploads/2012/01/GHG-emitters-2010.jpg 
7 Billion humans generate vast quantities of excrement. I believe this excrement is capable of providing all human electrical demands. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiolysis 
Right now hydrogen is perceived as a negative by product, of Nuclear Energy, when it should be the product, as the Pentagon has considered. reference info Request for Information (RFI) on Deployable Reactor Technologies ... DARPA-SN-10-37@darpa.mil
https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&mode=form&id=d0792af88a6a4484b3aa9d0dfeaaf553&...
Large scale conversions sites are intended to replace fossil fuel powered electrical facilities the Primary Source of Carbon Emissions.
http://www.populist.com/99.12.krebs.blob.html
In what officials now say was a mistaken strategy to reduce the waste's volume, organic chemicals were added years ago which were being bombarded by radiation fields, resulting in unwanted hydrogen. The hydrogen was then emitted in huge releases that official studies call burps, causing "waste-bergs," chunks of waste floating on the surface, to roll over.

Dennis Baker
106-998 Creston Avenue
Penticton BC  V2A1P9
cell phone              250-462-3796      
Phone / Fax              778-476-2633
dennisbaker2003@hotmail.com
@dennisearlbaker       
dennis baker at 5/3/2012 3:38 AM

Add Comment

Items on this list require content approval. Your submission will not appear in public views until approved by someone with proper rights. More information on content approval.

Name: *

eMail *

Comment *

Title

Attachments

Name: *


eMail *


Comment *


 

Refresh
Please enter the text displayed in the image.
The picture contains 6 characters.

Characters *

  

Legal Notice *

NDIA is not responsible for screening, policing, editing, or monitoring your or another user's postings and encourages all of its users to use reasonable discretion and caution in evaluating or reviewing any posting. Moreover, and except as provided below with respect to NDIA's right and ability to delete or remove a posting (or any part thereof), NDIA does not endorse, oppose, or edit any opinion or information provided by you or another user and does not make any representation with respect to, nor does it endorse the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or reliability of any advice, opinion, statement, or other material displayed, uploaded, or distributed by you or any other user. Nevertheless, NDIA reserves the right to delete or take other action with respect to postings (or parts thereof) that NDIA believes in good faith violate this Legal Notice and/or are potentially harmful or unlawful. If you violate this Legal Notice, NDIA may, in its sole discretion, delete the unacceptable content from your posting, remove or delete the posting in its entirety, issue you a warning, and/or terminate your use of the NDIA site. Moreover, it is a policy of NDIA to take appropriate actions under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and other applicable intellectual property laws. If you become aware of postings that violate these rules regarding acceptable behavior or content, you may contact NDIA at 703.522.1820.

 

 

Bookmark and Share