Twitter Facebook Google RSS
National Defense > Blog > Posts > Army Leaders Losing Tolerance for Absurdities in Weapon Acquisitions
Army Leaders Losing Tolerance for Absurdities in Weapon Acquisitions

Soon after Gen. Ray Odierno took over as chief of staff of the U.S. Army last fall, he noticed an atmosphere of gloom and doom surrounding weapon acquisitions.

“When I came in, the drumbeat I kept hearing was: ‘We have to change the way we buy equipment,’” Odierno said Feb. 21 during a meeting with reporters in Washington, D.C.

Only months before Odierno’s arrival, Army Secretary John McHugh had received a report by former procurement official Gil Decker and former Chief of Staff Gen. Lou Wagner that documented a litany of acquisition missteps that over the past two decades had led the Army down endless black holes of wasteful spending.

Odierno said past mistakes will not be repeated.

“We have to change, and we are changing,” he insisted. Many of the reforms that were spearheaded by Odierno’s former deputy, now retired Gen. Peter Chiarelli, will continue under his successor Gen. Lloyd J. Austin III, he said.

The most significant lesson from past failures is that equipment wish lists have to be grounded in the real world, rather than in science fiction, he said.

“We have gotten ourselves in trouble when we’ve tried to predict what technologies will be available 10 to 15 years from now, how fast they’ll get here and what impact they’ll have on the battlefield,” Odierno said. “We have to work closer with industry and be realistic about what we can do.”

The poster child of ill-fated military programs, the Future Combat Systems, has taught the Army many tough lessons, he said. “Matching requirements with technologies is key.”

The Army had hoped to design a new combat vehicle under FCS to replace the M-1 Abrams main battle tank. It made several unfruitful attempts to build a new combat helicopter to replace the aging Kiowa Warrior. And it continues to struggle to develop a new light truck to modernize the Humvee fleet.

Most of the Army’s current inventory consists of weapon systems that were conceived in the 1960s and 1970s — decades that are now regarded as the golden age of U.S. ground weapons.

Odierno cited the Stryker armored personnel carrier as a success story of the past decade, even though the vehicle is too thin skinned for operations in mine-infested war zones such as Afghanistan. The Stryker illustrates the dilemma the Army faces as it tries to buy a new combat vehicle. “The Stryker started out as a great medium-light vehicle. But it’s been weighed down [with extra armor] for survivability reasons. It’s no longer medium and not as mobile as we want it to be,” he said. The Army is looking for a vehicle with the “right mix of survivability and mobility.”

The Bradley Fighting Vehicle, one of the most widely used by infantry units in combat, is another case in point. Soldiers like its mobility, but the vehicle, too, is vulnerable to enemy bombs. “The statistics on survivability of the Bradley in Iraq and Afghanistan did not do well,” Odierno said. “We’ve lost more Bradleys than we have any other combat vehicle.”

The Army teamed with the Marine Corps to buy a replacement for the Humvee, the Joint Light Tactical Vehicle. Odierno supports the JLTV but questioned some of the technical specifications that caused the price tag to soar unnecessarily. “Some of the requirements are unreasonable from a technological perspective,” he said. “In JLTV we had a requirement that we had to drive up a 53-degree slope at 35 mph,” he said. Such nonsensical demands are what ultimately leads programs to fail, he suggested. “When I look at that, I think, ‘I don’t want us to be driving up a 53-degree slope, and not at 35 mph.”

According to the Decker-Wagner study, between 1990 and 2010, the Army terminated 22 major defense acquisition programs before completion, 15 of them since 2001.

“This track record of too many cancellations, schedule slippages, cost overruns and failures to deliver timely solutions to the war fighters’ requirements is unacceptable,” the report said. “The Army cannot afford to continue acquiring materiel the way it has in the last two decades.”


Re: Army Leaders Losing Tolerance for Absurdities in Weapon Acquisitions

What Congress, the Defense Department, and the Army are all running into is this long standing misconception about armor.  It goes back to Sir Isaac Newton, who said (paraphrased) that if you want to protect human beings from metal objects traveling at very high velocities, you need to use very heavy, very dense materials.  Which kinds of sets you back when you want "mobility".  And all this plastic "magic" armor is a bunch of crap. 

In the meantime, the taxpayer is getting screwed while all these well meaning folks are arguing with Sir Isaac.... 
Rock at 4/4/2012 7:21 AM

Add Comment

Items on this list require content approval. Your submission will not appear in public views until approved by someone with proper rights. More information on content approval.

Name: *

eMail *

Comment *



Name: *

eMail *

Comment *


Please enter the text displayed in the image.
The picture contains 6 characters.

Characters *


Legal Notice *

NDIA is not responsible for screening, policing, editing, or monitoring your or another user's postings and encourages all of its users to use reasonable discretion and caution in evaluating or reviewing any posting. Moreover, and except as provided below with respect to NDIA's right and ability to delete or remove a posting (or any part thereof), NDIA does not endorse, oppose, or edit any opinion or information provided by you or another user and does not make any representation with respect to, nor does it endorse the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or reliability of any advice, opinion, statement, or other material displayed, uploaded, or distributed by you or any other user. Nevertheless, NDIA reserves the right to delete or take other action with respect to postings (or parts thereof) that NDIA believes in good faith violate this Legal Notice and/or are potentially harmful or unlawful. If you violate this Legal Notice, NDIA may, in its sole discretion, delete the unacceptable content from your posting, remove or delete the posting in its entirety, issue you a warning, and/or terminate your use of the NDIA site. Moreover, it is a policy of NDIA to take appropriate actions under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and other applicable intellectual property laws. If you become aware of postings that violate these rules regarding acceptable behavior or content, you may contact NDIA at 703.522.1820.



Bookmark and Share