Twitter Facebook Google RSS
 
National Defense > Blog > Posts > U.S. Debates Removal of Weapons Ban on Vietnam as China Asserts Territorial Claims
U.S. Debates Removal of Weapons Ban on Vietnam as China Asserts Territorial Claims
By Sarah Sicard



With relations warming, the U.S. ban on the sale of lethal weapons to Vietnam has come into question. Some government officials in both the United States and Vietnam are advocating for restrictions to be repealed, citing a need to boost Vietnam's defense capabilities in the face of a rising China, according to a recent think tank report.
 
Over the last decade, the United States has developed a close working relationship with Vietnam, and the two militaries have become strategically close. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Army Gen. Martin Dempsey visited the country in mid-August and Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel is tentatively scheduled to go there in November, said a 
Center for Strategic a International Studies report, Washington Needs a Plan for Lifting Its Weapons Sales Ban on Vietnam authored by Murray Hiebert and Phuong Nguyen.

Despite progress, the United States still maintains the ban, reiterating that its removal will not be possible without Vietnamese cooperation in addressing its human rights violations, the report said. 

Consideration for lifting the ban has been gaining momentum since the beginning of the summer. With support from advocates such as Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Ted Osius, nominee for U.S. Ambassador to Vietnam, talks about removing the ban have intensified, the report said. Vietnamese officials also favor a relaxation of the ban, with removal following close after, it added.

Daniel Darling, Forecast International's Europe and Asia-Pacific military markets analyst, said the process to ease the ban on the sale of lethal weapons to Vietnam has been a slow, but steady one since the middle of the past decade. 

Relations between the two countries have warmed considerably since the Clinton administration, with ties continuing to improve under both the Bush and Obama administrations, he said. 

"The United States and Vietnam share economic ties, maritime security concerns and, in particular, worries over the long-term ambitions of China," Darling said.
 
The issues involving China are of particular importance to U.S. maritime trade and security interests in the Asia-Pacific. Vietnam's location gives it a strong geographic foothold in the region. And while tensions between China and Vietnam have been longstanding, China's increased aggression in the South China Sea has served as a catalyst for discussion, the report said.
 
Darling said: "The competing territorial claims of Vietnam and Beijing in the South China Sea often serve as a touchstone for gauging how the two countries interact in the public eye, and the latest incident back in May involving China's state-owned national offshore oil company placing an oil rig in Vietnamese-claimed waters sparked a public outcry inside Vietnam."
 
However, there are some who suggest that Chinese aggression as a motivator for lifting the ban may not make for a fruitful alliance between the United States and Vietnam.
 
"There is no doubt that Chinese aggression will be a significant factor in the decision to lift the weapons ban against Vietnam, but it is not the only factor," said Olivia Enos, a research assistant with the Heritage Foundation's Davis Institute for National Security and Foreign Policy. "There is also the fact that Vietnam does not necessarily share a U.S. interest in balancing against China — the assumption that underlies so much of the advocacy on this issue."
 
According to the CSIS report, some officials in Washington are concerned that by lifting the arms sales ban in order to quell Chinese aggression, they risk losing leverage on human rights issues.
 
Those issues aside, Vietnam's military purchases will have little impact on the U.S. defense industrial base when paired with the fact that its budget leaves between $3 billion and $3.5 billion a year for extraneous defense purchases — meaning it has little purchasing p
ower to expand its arsenal extensively, said Darling. The country also maintains a close relationship with Russia when it comes to buying weapons.
 
"While Gen. Martin Dempsey's recent visit to Ho Chi Minh City was a good indicator that full normalization of ties are on the horizon, how soon remains a question," said Darling. "Many in Congress continue to question Vietnam's record on human rights, but the same concerns in the legislative body did not prevent the previous administration from lifting an embargo on Indonesia. If seen as a valuable partner in countering the rise of piracy, arms trafficking or a strategic rival, exceptions will almost always be made."


Photo Credits: Thinkstock, Defense Department

Comments

Re: U.S. Debates Removal of Weapons Ban on Vietnam as China Asserts Territorial Claims

Gun comes with responsibility
Let's look at the 2 aspects of Gun:
The physical gun and bullet: It is unlikely that Vietnam can shoot all psychotic PLA generals with the US Guns and Norwegian Bullets
The PLA + CCP have prepared for the domination since 1972 with the economic pie that President Nixon, Japanese corporations, EU corporations gave it to them.

Vietnam can be the most reliable US partner and ally, but the PLA + CCP will prevent it at all costs, there are solutions but it takes time.
Example: Nokia phone Made in Vietnam that destined to the US market, it should have 90 % of materials sourced from the Pacific partnership such as South Korea, Finland, Japan, US...likewise with shirts and pants.

The spiritual aspect is the most paramount in the long run: Analyse the Ali G series to understand it

"There is also the fact that Vietnam does not necessarily share a U.S. interest in balancing against China — the assumption that underlies so much of the advocacy on this issue."

Vietnam do share a U.S. interest in balancing against China
The very fact that Vietnam shares land, sea border that make it hard to openly support the U.S. and Japan
Imagine like this: every time a US Naval ship visits Cam Ranh Bay, the PLA + CCP will place an oil rig within Vietnam EEZ to dig for domestic violence and dump their PLA made to destroy Vietnam economy a few months later. How would the U.S. help Vietnam in the case like that? or the PLA naval ships would harass Vietnamese fishermen on a daily basis. the PLA has enjoyed the U.S. + Japan + Euro economic Pie 1975 to 1995 whereas Vietnam have had the embargo 1975 - 1995. It's called Doom and Gloom period 1975-1995.
Bear in Mind, PLA + CCP are not gentlemen
  

Anyway, Burger King is in Phu Quoc
To be Continued
G Lesbo at 9/2/2014 11:53 PM

Add Comment

Items on this list require content approval. Your submission will not appear in public views until approved by someone with proper rights. More information on content approval.

Name: *

eMail *

Comment *

Title

Attachments

Name: *


eMail *


Comment *


 

Refresh
Please enter the text displayed in the image.
The picture contains 6 characters.

Characters *

  

Legal Notice *

NDIA is not responsible for screening, policing, editing, or monitoring your or another user's postings and encourages all of its users to use reasonable discretion and caution in evaluating or reviewing any posting. Moreover, and except as provided below with respect to NDIA's right and ability to delete or remove a posting (or any part thereof), NDIA does not endorse, oppose, or edit any opinion or information provided by you or another user and does not make any representation with respect to, nor does it endorse the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or reliability of any advice, opinion, statement, or other material displayed, uploaded, or distributed by you or any other user. Nevertheless, NDIA reserves the right to delete or take other action with respect to postings (or parts thereof) that NDIA believes in good faith violate this Legal Notice and/or are potentially harmful or unlawful. If you violate this Legal Notice, NDIA may, in its sole discretion, delete the unacceptable content from your posting, remove or delete the posting in its entirety, issue you a warning, and/or terminate your use of the NDIA site. Moreover, it is a policy of NDIA to take appropriate actions under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and other applicable intellectual property laws. If you become aware of postings that violate these rules regarding acceptable behavior or content, you may contact NDIA at 703.522.1820.

 

 

Bookmark and Share