Twitter Facebook Google RSS
National Defense > Blog > Posts > The Virtual Border Fence: At $2 Million Per Mile, Is It Worth It?
The Virtual Border Fence: At $2 Million Per Mile, Is It Worth It?
When it comes to the technology that would create a virtual fence on the U.S. southern border, Customs and Border Protection has found itself in a chicken-or-the-egg scenario.

Whether the $1.3 billion invested in electro-optical cameras and laser range-finders on poles along the border is worth it can’t be determined until the system is fully deployed and it is working properly. On the other hand, the U.S. government shouldn’t be spending massive amounts of money deploying technology that hasn’t been proven to work. That was the gist of the testimony at a joint hearing held by two House Homeland Security subcommittees today.

In the works since 2006, and now on hold pending a review ordered by Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, the Secure Border Initiative’s technology piece was mismanaged, and on a downward spiral from its inception. Randolph Hite, director of information technology architecture and systems issues at the Government Accountability Office, said CBP management “has struggled to right itself during the last 18 months.”

The decision to invest in the technology should not have been made until there were reliable cost estimates to deploy the system, as well as “quantifiable and qualitative” data on the benefits it would provide. And there are currently no dependable cost estimates on the funds needed to maintain the system throughout its lifecycle, Hite added. Up until one year ago, there were only eight personnel in the entire Homeland Security Department who could do cost estimates, he testified.

Meanwhile, standards, the amount of territory the system is intended to cover, and the capabilities the equipment is supposed to provide continue to decline. The original plan called for the so-called virtual fence technology to be deployed along 655 miles of border. That is now down to 387 miles. Performance requirements for the system are now “deemed acceptable if it identifies less than 50 percent of the items of interest that cross the border,” Hite said.

Further, there has not been a reliable schedule for the deployment of the block 1. Every deadline has been missed during the last four years, and schedule delays are likely to continue, Hite said. Mark Borkowski, executive director of the SBI program executive office, said he is not convinced that the “program is viable,” and that he agreed with every point in Hite’s testimony.
There are two tests scheduled for this year in two Arizona sectors where the technology has been deployed and turned over to Border Patrol agents to use — one in September and one at the end of the year.

Representatives expressed frustration that the review Napolitano ordered had not been completed six months after its announcement. Roger Krone, president of network and space systems at Boeing Defense, Space and Security, gave some estimates on how much it would cost to deploy the technology: $100 million to $110 million for a proposed 60-mile swath of the border, and $50 million to $60 million each for two other 30-miles stretch of the border. That would be about $2 million per mile, he said. He did offer any lifecycle cost estimates, and none of the lawmakers pressed him for a number.


Re: The Virtual Border Fence: At $2 Million Per Mile, Is It Worth It?

US Border Patrol and DHS should buy Israel made virtual fence equipment, and the critics will shut up becuase critism on those equipments used for the virtual fence in Israel against Islamist terrorists will mean anti-semitism, and anti-Israel. Not even the CBS will try to risk a name game being criticized for anti-semitism for slamming Israel made equipments.
pedestrian at 6/23/2010 11:53 AM

Re: The Virtual Border Fence: At $2 Million Per Mile, Is It Worth It?

Thanks for the interview...always good to read the insights of an accomplished writer!
Puma  Shoes at 6/30/2010 3:05 AM

Add Comment

Items on this list require content approval. Your submission will not appear in public views until approved by someone with proper rights. More information on content approval.

Name: *

eMail *

Comment *



Name: *

eMail *

Comment *


Please enter the text displayed in the image.
The picture contains 6 characters.

Characters *


Legal Notice *

NDIA is not responsible for screening, policing, editing, or monitoring your or another user's postings and encourages all of its users to use reasonable discretion and caution in evaluating or reviewing any posting. Moreover, and except as provided below with respect to NDIA's right and ability to delete or remove a posting (or any part thereof), NDIA does not endorse, oppose, or edit any opinion or information provided by you or another user and does not make any representation with respect to, nor does it endorse the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or reliability of any advice, opinion, statement, or other material displayed, uploaded, or distributed by you or any other user. Nevertheless, NDIA reserves the right to delete or take other action with respect to postings (or parts thereof) that NDIA believes in good faith violate this Legal Notice and/or are potentially harmful or unlawful. If you violate this Legal Notice, NDIA may, in its sole discretion, delete the unacceptable content from your posting, remove or delete the posting in its entirety, issue you a warning, and/or terminate your use of the NDIA site. Moreover, it is a policy of NDIA to take appropriate actions under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and other applicable intellectual property laws. If you become aware of postings that violate these rules regarding acceptable behavior or content, you may contact NDIA at 703.522.1820.



Bookmark and Share