Twitter Facebook Google RSS
 
National Defense > Blog > Posts > Market for Service Contracts Shrinking, and So Is the Number of Competitors
Market for Service Contracts Shrinking, and So Is the Number of Competitors
By Sandra I. Erwin



Facing a steep decline in government spending on support contractors, companies in this sector are rushing to consolidate and cut expense as price-based competitions become the norm in service contracts.

The recent acquisition of longtime government services contractor Dynamics Research Corp. by major competitor Engility underscores the changing environment of the industry.

Engiliy, a company that was spun off by defense contractor L-3 as a pure-play government services contractor, completed the $120 million acquisition of DRC Jan. 31. Executives touted the deal as an early jump ahead of the next wave of industry consolidation.  

"There are too many competitors chasing too few opportunities," said Engility CEO Tony Smeraglinolo.

The market for defense and intelligence contract services exploded from 2001 to 2011, peaking at about $200 billion, while the number of contractors in the sector soared from 45,000 to 130,000. With the business now headed for a sharp decline, the industry will shrink but there will still be lucrative opportunities, Smeraglinolo said in an interview.

"When we formed Engility in 2012, we knew this market space was going to get more constrained," he said. The company, based in Chantilly, Va., has 7,000 employees and 2012 revenue of $1.6 billion. With the acquisition of DRC, Engility expects to gain up to $5 billion worth of contracting opportunities in professional services for the Air Force, intelligence agencies, military healthcare programs and Veterans Affairs. It expects to absorb most of DRC's 1,100 employees, he said.

"This opens up some new markets," said Smeraglinolo. In today's climate of reduced government spending, there has to be consolidation and mergers, he said. "This will continue. We wanted to be a first mover."

The key to survival in this sector is to offer the lowest possible price, said Smeraglinolo. “We created a company for this particular market, with cost in mind.” Government missions are not changing but agencies now demand lower cost, he said.

Although some analysts and investors have predicted gloom and doom in the government services sector, the reality is more nuanced, Smeraglinolo said. The Defense Department, for instance, is cutting back on service contracts but also forgoing acquisitions of new weapons, logistics systems and information networks. As a result, there should be greater demand for maintenance and support of existing systems, he said. “There will always be a need to have readiness and training.”

Another consideration is the demographics of the government workforce. By some estimates, about a third of the current civilian cadre will be eligible to retire by 2017. “If the government still has to operate, there may be a greater need for service providers to fill that gap.”

Smeraglinolo said his company welcomes Defense Department contracting policies that put cost above all other criteria. Under the contractor evaluation method known as “lowest cost, technically acceptable,” the government defines what is technically acceptable and it is up to the contractor to figure out how to deliver it at the lowest possible cost. “We embrace these initiatives,” said Smeraglinolo. “We're competing on efficiency.”

Photo Credit: Thinkstock

Comments

There are no comments yet for this post.
Items on this list require content approval. Your submission will not appear in public views until approved by someone with proper rights. More information on content approval.

Name: *

eMail *

Comment *

Title

Attachments

Name: *


eMail *


Comment *


 

Refresh
Please enter the text displayed in the image.
The picture contains 6 characters.

Characters *

  

Legal Notice *

NDIA is not responsible for screening, policing, editing, or monitoring your or another user's postings and encourages all of its users to use reasonable discretion and caution in evaluating or reviewing any posting. Moreover, and except as provided below with respect to NDIA's right and ability to delete or remove a posting (or any part thereof), NDIA does not endorse, oppose, or edit any opinion or information provided by you or another user and does not make any representation with respect to, nor does it endorse the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or reliability of any advice, opinion, statement, or other material displayed, uploaded, or distributed by you or any other user. Nevertheless, NDIA reserves the right to delete or take other action with respect to postings (or parts thereof) that NDIA believes in good faith violate this Legal Notice and/or are potentially harmful or unlawful. If you violate this Legal Notice, NDIA may, in its sole discretion, delete the unacceptable content from your posting, remove or delete the posting in its entirety, issue you a warning, and/or terminate your use of the NDIA site. Moreover, it is a policy of NDIA to take appropriate actions under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and other applicable intellectual property laws. If you become aware of postings that violate these rules regarding acceptable behavior or content, you may contact NDIA at 703.522.1820.

 

 

Bookmark and Share