Twitter Facebook Google RSS
 
National Defense > Blog > Posts > Defense Official: Electronic Warfare Systems Needed, but Not Immune From Cuts
Defense Official: Electronic Warfare Systems Needed, but Not Immune From Cuts
By Valerie Insinna
 



With every Pentagon research and procurement program facing up to a 20 percent reduction, even critical technologies such as electronic warfare are on the table, said Al Shaffer,
acting assistant secretary of defense for research and engineering.

The Pentagon will have to decide just how important electronic warfare systems are to its strategy, Shaffer said
Oct. 28 at the Association of Old Crows international symposium.
 
"We have to be bold enough, leadership-wise, not to take a salami slicer to the budget. Some areas may be more important than others," he said. "When you're faced with a crisis, you do have the opportunity to make some bold decisions. You can actually terminate work in some areas that's not very important. … If EW is truly important to the government, I think they'll find a way to fund it."
 
Meanwhile, adversaries are developing electronic warfare systems that cover higher and lower frequencies, stressing U.S. technologies more than ever before, he said. "We've got to develop adaptability, we've got to be able to go to much broader bandwidth, we've got to develop agility in our waveform to be able to deal with a new class of threats coming out of the digital domain."
 
Common among all services is the desire for modular electronic warfare systems that allow parts to be swapped and software to be uploaded easily.
 
Improved electronic warfare capabilities are also needed to protect systems in space, such as the global positioning system, which could be degraded or jammed, Shaffer said.
 
The Air Force recently launched its “advanced components for electronic warfare” program, focused on basic electronic parts such as millimeter wave technologies and photonics, said Russell Partch, the Air Force’s C4ISR technology lead. The service this summer awarded nine contracts worth nearly $3 million.
 
The Army is on the hunt for electronic warfare technologies that are lighter, smaller and use less power, said Nancy Harned of the office of the deputy assistant secretary of the Army for research and technology. "They have to be cheap enough that they can be bought in large quantities [and] be portable by the soldier."
 
The Navy wants to be able to operate across the entire electromagnetic spectrum, giving sailors the capability to create false signatures without allowing adversaries to jam the service’s sensors, said Walter Jones, executive director of the Office of Naval Research. Jones did not cite any specific requirements, but said the Navy is continuing to invest in electronic warfare despite budget challenges.
 
Director of National Intelligence James Clapper gave a keynote speech in which he named sequestration, insider threats and the possibility of further government shutdowns as three of the biggest challenges to the intelligence community.
 
It’s difficult to convey the impact of sequestration to the public, especially when many of its effects will take months or even years to notice, Clapper said. If reductions under sequestration continue, there will be less intelligence available for personnel to analyze.
 
“From my vantage, where I sit, we simply can’t sustain the cuts … over the long term,” he said.

Photo Credit: Navy, EA-18G Growler

Comments

There are no comments yet for this post.
Items on this list require content approval. Your submission will not appear in public views until approved by someone with proper rights. More information on content approval.

Name: *

eMail *

Comment *

Title

Attachments

Name: *


eMail *


Comment *


 

Refresh
Please enter the text displayed in the image.
The picture contains 6 characters.

Characters *

  

Legal Notice *

NDIA is not responsible for screening, policing, editing, or monitoring your or another user's postings and encourages all of its users to use reasonable discretion and caution in evaluating or reviewing any posting. Moreover, and except as provided below with respect to NDIA's right and ability to delete or remove a posting (or any part thereof), NDIA does not endorse, oppose, or edit any opinion or information provided by you or another user and does not make any representation with respect to, nor does it endorse the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or reliability of any advice, opinion, statement, or other material displayed, uploaded, or distributed by you or any other user. Nevertheless, NDIA reserves the right to delete or take other action with respect to postings (or parts thereof) that NDIA believes in good faith violate this Legal Notice and/or are potentially harmful or unlawful. If you violate this Legal Notice, NDIA may, in its sole discretion, delete the unacceptable content from your posting, remove or delete the posting in its entirety, issue you a warning, and/or terminate your use of the NDIA site. Moreover, it is a policy of NDIA to take appropriate actions under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and other applicable intellectual property laws. If you become aware of postings that violate these rules regarding acceptable behavior or content, you may contact NDIA at 703.522.1820.

 

 

Bookmark and Share