National Defense > Blog > Posts > Women on Submarines: It's the Education, Stupid
Women on Submarines: It's the Education, Stupid
The Navy’s decision to finally allow women to serve aboard submarines has been described as an experiment in social engineering.

But it really isn’t. The Navy, for practical reasons, needs female officers in the submarine force. More than trying to be a champion of gender equality, today’s high-tech Navy is reaching out to women in no small measure because more females have advanced technical degrees, says Navy Rear Adm. Barry Bruner, commander of the Submarine Group Ten.

Bruner heads the so-called “Task Force for Women in Submarines,” which is overseeing the process of integrating women, for the first time, into submarine crews. Women were first assigned to selected noncombatant ships in 1978. In 1994, following the repeal of a combat exclusion law, women were allowed to be assigned to combatant surface ships.

As submarines, and the Navy overall, become more technologically advanced, sailors require higher levels of education. More women than men these days are acquiring technical degrees, so it only makes pragmatic sense for the Navy to bring them aboard, Bruner tells military bloggers in a teleconference this week from Kings Bay, Ga.

Over the last 40 years, the percentage of Navy males who graduate from college with technical degrees has declined from 75 percent to about 45 percent, he says. “And women have gone up to the point where today women are actually gaining more technical degrees than men are,” says Bruner. “So we really need to open up the talent pool so that we can maintain the best officers available on the submarine force.”

Bruner’s Submarine Group Ten has two squadrons, one of ballistic missile submarines and a squadron of cruise missile submarines.

“When you go to nuclear power school, that is, for all intents and purposes, a graduate school for nuclear power,” he says. “It would be very tough for any individual who doesn't have a good background in calculus and physics and those technical topics to be able to survive a nuclear power school. It's tough enough for people who have a degree in electrical engineering or chemical engineering or structural engineering. … So that's really the big thing, is the way our educational pipeline is set up for them to be able to survive, they have to come in there with a pretty good technical base.”

Navy leaders in recent years have seen “more and more women getting technical education and fewer and fewer men,” says Bruner. “So for us to maintain a great pool for us to pick from of the most talented young people to become officers in the nuclear submarine fleet, we really need to open up our talent pool, because the pool's getting smaller as we move forward.”  

The move to allow women on submarines has come under criticism from traditionalists who point out that submarines have little room to accommodate separate facilities for men and women. “In private, many will tell you women don't belong in such an atmosphere, they can't cut it, and they would be a distraction to male sailors,” Bruner says.

But he is confident that the transition can be achieved successfully. The women who are now being trained will reach their submarines for the first time in late 2011 or early 2012. They'll be assigned to eight submarine crews, two crews on each of two submarines on each coast.    

There will be two female trained nuclear officers on each of the eight crews, and additionally there will be a more senior supply officer who will serve both as a mentor for new female ensigns and for male officers in the wardroom, says Bruner.  

The Navy has no immediate plans to allow enlisted women in submarines.  

At the U.S. Naval Academy, 138 seniors this year were selected to enter the submarine training program. These midshipmen were chosen based one their academic records and knowledge of technical topics. About 20 female seniors will be picked from 2010 graduating classes at schools across the country.

It still remains to be seen whether the Navy’s newest class of submarines, the Virgina class, will accept females in their crews. So far that seems unlikely, says Bruner. “We're still looking at that,” he says. “The Virginia Class is not built to allow privacy for men and women, so one of the things we have to figure out is what would be the configuration change to the submarine that we'd need to make, and how much would it cost and what would the impact be on the operational ability of the submarine?” he says. “Those are all questions that we're in the process of trying to get answers to. But until we get those answers, we won't be able to come up with a date.”

Comments

Re: Women on Submarines: It's the Education, Stupid

been there.    done that.     they are under political pressure to pursue this.    bad idea.

if you haven't been there, you are not qualified to give an informed opinion.
chief white at 5/17/2010 3:10 PM

Re: Women on Submarines: It's the Education, Stupid

considered how conforming it must be to see all those brilliant lights as the warm hearths of loved ones.
coach handbags at 6/16/2010 10:14 PM

Re: Women on Submarines: It's the Education, Stupid

This was a extremely high quality post. I really like this blog...nice to meet you!
Jordan AJF8 at 6/24/2010 3:25 AM

Re: Women on Submarines: It's the Education, Stupid

Thanks for posting this topic. I will bookmark your site to check if you write more about in the future.
Jordan Jumpman at 6/29/2010 11:41 PM

Re: Women on Submarines: It's the Education, Stupid

Your blog really brought some things to light. You should continue this, I'm sure most people would agree your view!
vibram five fingers at 6/30/2010 4:00 AM

Add Comment

Items on this list require content approval. Your submission will not appear in public views until approved by someone with proper rights. More information on content approval.

Name: *

eMail *

Comment *

Title

Attachments

Name: *


eMail *


Comment *


 

Refresh
Please enter the text displayed in the image.
The picture contains 6 characters.

Characters *

  

Legal Notice *

NDIA is not responsible for screening, policing, editing, or monitoring your or another user's postings and encourages all of its users to use reasonable discretion and caution in evaluating or reviewing any posting. Moreover, and except as provided below with respect to NDIA's right and ability to delete or remove a posting (or any part thereof), NDIA does not endorse, oppose, or edit any opinion or information provided by you or another user and does not make any representation with respect to, nor does it endorse the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or reliability of any advice, opinion, statement, or other material displayed, uploaded, or distributed by you or any other user. Nevertheless, NDIA reserves the right to delete or take other action with respect to postings (or parts thereof) that NDIA believes in good faith violate this Legal Notice and/or are potentially harmful or unlawful. If you violate this Legal Notice, NDIA may, in its sole discretion, delete the unacceptable content from your posting, remove or delete the posting in its entirety, issue you a warning, and/or terminate your use of the NDIA site. Moreover, it is a policy of NDIA to take appropriate actions under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and other applicable intellectual property laws. If you become aware of postings that violate these rules regarding acceptable behavior or content, you may contact NDIA at 703.522.1820.

 

 

Bookmark and Share