Twitter Facebook Google RSS
 
National Defense > Blog > Posts > Military Weighed Down by Heavy Equipment, Excess Infrastructure
Military Weighed Down by Heavy Equipment, Excess Infrastructure
By Sandra I. Erwin


U.S. Marines in Helmand province, Afghanistan

Today’s military is too dependent on heavy equipment, consumes too much fuel and is weighed down by an industrial-age infrastructure that costs too much to maintain.

That reality needs to change, military officials said. Combat forces in the future will need to deploy quickly, in small units, with relatively light equipment and require little logistics support. War planners believe the Pentagon has to invest in new technology and develop fresh ideas to prepare U.S. forces to fight enemies who will be adept at disrupting supply lines and choking off access to ports and airfields.

 “We need innovative, low cost, small footprint approaches” to prepare the military for future wars, said Air Force Lt. Gen. Brooks Bash, director of logistics on the Joint Staff.

The Pentagon’s much-lauded logistics machine has excelled in every war thus far, but it is showing signs of age. Bash said he worries that U.S. logistics operations are not positioned for the realities of combat in the 21st century.

In many ways, the military organizations that provide logistics support — transportation, fuel and supplies — are still organized to fight World War III, officials said last week at the National Defense Industrial Association’s logistics symposium in Arlington, Va.

Changing that will require sweeping reforms in the way the military does business, they said, and also congressional approval to shed billions of dollars worth of unneeded facilities and inventories.

The Defense Logistics Agency, for instance, has $14 billion worth of inventory, but only half of that is usable, said Navy Vice Adm. Mark D. Harnitchek, director of DLA. “We have way too much inventory,” he said. Excess supplies are costly to store and keep DLA from shedding unneeded infrastructure. “We have to get rid of the hoarding mentality,” said Harnitchek. Billions of dollars are tied up in aging stocks and facilities that could be spent on modern equipment. “We have vintage World War II infrastructure to store fuel,” he said. DLA currently must keep large quantities of military-unique fuel, called JP-8, which requires specialized storage units. If the Air Force and Navy were able to use commercial jet fuel in their airplanes, it would save lots of money and simplify the services’ logistics support operations, Harnitchek said. He noted that both the Air Force and the Navy would like to move in that direction.

The military also needs to find ways to consume less fuel, Bash said. Planning for any war will become exceedingly difficult, as enemies have figured out that fuel dependence makes U.S. forces vulnerable. “Operational energy is a huge challenge,” Bash said. Each U.S. soldier in Afghanistan on average requires 23 gallons of fuel per day.

Vice Adm. Phil Cullom, deputy chief of naval operations for fleet readiness and logistics, said reducing fuel demands is a major focus of his efforts. The U.S. logistics system is not geared for wars where enemies will seek to deny access, he said. “We need the right logistics support for ‘anti-access, area denial’” scenarios, Cullom said. “We need resilient networks.”

Another headache for logisticians is the enormous weight and bulk of the equipment that U.S. forces take to war. The Pentagon needs to rethink how it will equip ground forces in the future, Bash said. The most visible illustration of this problem is the heavily armored mine-resistant ambush protected (MRAP) truck that is now ubiquitous in war zones. “The vehicles saved many lives,” he said. “But MRAP is slow, heavy and logistics maintenance nightmare.” Enemies are just going to keep making bigger bombs to outmatch U.S. vehicles, he said. “Can we keep building a bigger MRAP?”

Bash mentioned the Lithuanian Special Forces’ use of motorcycles in Afghanistan as an example of how to think differently about the problem. Troops can move faster on motorcycles, and they are light enough that they do not set off pressure-activated buried bombs, he said. “And you can buy 1,000 Kawasaki KLS motorcycles for the price of one MRAP.” This is not just about new technology, he said, but also using existing equipment in a new way.

The Marine Corps also struggles with the logistics burdens of heavy equipment, said Maj. Gen. Michael Dana, assistant deputy command for installations and logistics. “We have gotten too heavy,” he said. U.S. forces must become more “expeditionary” and more agile, he said. That cannot be achieved with current equipment, Dana asserted. Not only is gear too heavy but also energy intensive. A tank company today requires three trucks’ worth of gear and lots of power generators, he said.

Also weighing heavy on the military services are unwanted facilities. The cost of maintaining too many bases and depots is one reason why the Air Force has been unable to modernize its equipment, said Air Force Lt. Gen. Judith Fedder, deputy chief of staff for logistics, installations and mission support.

Congress over the past two years has blocked every attempt by the Defense Department to close unneeded bases. “Without being able to shut down installations, the best we can do work on the margins,” Fedder said. The military services have maintenance depots that do not operate at full capacity. Consolidating these facilities is worth considering, she said. “I think this is probably an untapped area.” As with base closures, he said, “There are lots of restrictions on what we can do to draw down capability.”

The Air Force is under pressure to modernize its equipment, and with the Pentagon’s budget on a downward slope, the only way to do that is by shedding overhead, Fedder said. “Just opening a gate is expensive.” Efficiencies such as “green” buildings that demand less energy are useful, but the monetary savings are negligible, she said. “It’s the cost of opening the gate, of sustaining an installation is absolutely not sustainable into the future,” she said. “We have to continue to reduce force structure just to keep the gates open.”

The Army is in a similar predicament. It has five major maintenance depots and three arsenals, and that is more than is needed, said Lt. Gen. Raymond Mason, Army deputy chief of staff for logistics. “We are probably over capacity inside our organic industrial base,” he said. Base closure authority would help make these operations more efficient, he added. As workload declines, the cost of fixing equipment at depots will rise, while the Army’s budget keeps coming down. None of these trends bode well for the future, Mason said.

Photo Credit: Defense Dept.

Comments

Re: Military Weighed Down by Heavy Equipment, Excess Infrastructure

This is a very interesting topic. Seems like there are many practicalities to it and I am wondering if a practical approach is being taken to address the concerns. Is the heavy equipment resold to private business or redeployed ot other governmental units who need the equipment? Are contracts to refurbish the heavy equipment considered to replace the higher costs of running maintenance depots? For example, heavy equipment companies like http://www.livequipment.com refurbish machines to extend their life which is good for the environment and good for the businesses who need used heavy equipment to survive in the construction world. It would be useful to see partnerships build between the military and similar heavy equipment refurbishers and resellers.
JED Alliance at 6/18/2013 11:51 AM

Re: Military Weighed Down by Heavy Equipment, Excess Infrastructure

I kind of disagree.  The U.S. Military has bleed and spent a lot of money to get the heavy armored MRAPs into inventory.  To reflect, the Army had NO real 4X4 armored cars except the M1114 and the M1117 ASV when other nations' armies had armored cars aplenty.

I do agree that perhaps DoD has a lot of old, outdated, and unused items in inventory that should be cleared, but the photo of the MRAP doesn't seem to quite mix with the article.  The MRAP is the newest and most capable item the DoD has purchased recently...and now DoD wants to get rid of most of them?

So now they're saying the DoD has too many armored cars (MRAPs) that are too heavy?  Sound familiar?  This harks back to the Stryker Brigade Combat Team and the Future Combat System (FCS) then 40-tons and then 20-tons for FCS when the complaint was that the M1A1s and M2A2s were too heavy.  Geez, rerun-the-repeat...both SBCT and FCS have been tried and tested and the Army returned to heavy armor again because of the need. 

If the U.S. Army wants new lighter vehicles, then by all means buy them off-the-shelf: LAV3s, Strykers, ASVs, German Boxers and Pumas, Italian Centauros, Swedish CV90s, etc.  But to up-armor is harder.  I don't think it is wise for the U.S. Army to shed off a lot of the MRAPs and M-ATVs that took so long, hard, and billions of dollars worth to obtain.  This seems to be a repeat of the FCS doctrine that bore hardly any product and years of testing and waiting.  Remember, the U.S. Army hardly had ANY 4X4 armored cars before 9/11.  The U.S. Marines hardly had any, period.
Peter at 6/19/2013 8:26 PM

Re: Military Weighed Down by Heavy Equipment, Excess Infrastructure

Great Job! I appreciate your writing. Thanks for your detail info. Here I would like to suggest a safety tool.
<a href="http://www.raptorlite.com"> Raporlite </a>-The World’s Brightest Tactical Flashlight
A tactical flashlight could be your most effective weapon when it comes to self-defense. If you’re under attack, you don’t want to hesitate for a second and by using the world’s brightest tactical light you ensure you can identify the assailant immediately and take appropriate action.
<a href="http://www.raptorlite.com"> Raporlite </a> is no ordinary flashlight. Our tactical flashlights are used by law enforcement officers and military personnel who need to use the brightest lights available on their weapons. A gun with a mounted <a href="http://www.raptorlite.com"> Raporlite </a> allows the user to see their target clearly, even in the darkest conditions, and aim with complete accuracy.
Using a handgun in low light can be a recipe for disaster. Not only are you likely to miss your intended target, but you are also at risk of injuring anyone who may wander in front of your path if you cannot see clearly. The best tactical flashlights light up the area like daylight so you can see exactly what your gun is pointing at.
 A tactical flashlight – your first line of defense
But <a href="http://www.raptorlite.com"> Raporlite </a> tactical flashlights don’t have to be mounted to a gun in order to be a great tool for self-defense. Attackers generally don’t like to be seen and just shining this super bright light at them may be enough to deter opportunistic attacks.
If you’re planning to be out in an area that is not well lit, it makes sense to carry one of our compact LED flashlights with you. We’ve all been in situations where we feel unsafe walking in the street at night and for good reason – most attacks happen under cover of darkness. You have less chance of being mugged if there are no shadowy areas for attackers to lurk in and as the world’s brightest tactical flashlight<a href="http://www.raptorlite.com"> Raporlite </a> can illuminate half a mile in front of you.
Another simple but effective function of the <a href="http://www.raptorlite.com"> Raporlite </a> tactical light is its ability to dazzle would-be attackers. As your first line of defense, shining this insanely bright light into the assailant’s eyes will disorient them and cause them to lose their vision for a few seconds, allowing you to escape or raise the alarm.
If it comes to it, you can also use our tactical flashlights as a weapon if you are attacked and have no other method of self-defense. The aggressive attack bezel can be used to strike an attacker in the face before he can make advances.
What is the best tactical flashlight?
Our flashlights are compact, making them easy to carry on your person. They’re also rechargeable so there is no risk of running out of batteries, rendering your flashlight useless. As the world’s brightest tactical flashlight, the <a href="http://www.raptorlite.com"> Raporlite </a> is three times brighter than the nearest competitor and also the best value, at a price you’ll find hard to believe.
When it comes to your safety, there is really no excuse to settle for anything less than the best. By choosing a <a href="http://www.raptorlite.com"> Raporlite </a> tactical LED flashlight, you can have peace of mind knowing that you are fully prepared in case of attack.
For detail information Please go http://www.raptorlite.com
Prabal Chowdhury at 7/13/2013 11:24 PM

Add Comment

Items on this list require content approval. Your submission will not appear in public views until approved by someone with proper rights. More information on content approval.

Name: *

eMail *

Comment *

Title

Attachments

Name: *


eMail *


Comment *


 

Refresh
Please enter the text displayed in the image.
The picture contains 6 characters.

Characters *

  

Legal Notice *

NDIA is not responsible for screening, policing, editing, or monitoring your or another user's postings and encourages all of its users to use reasonable discretion and caution in evaluating or reviewing any posting. Moreover, and except as provided below with respect to NDIA's right and ability to delete or remove a posting (or any part thereof), NDIA does not endorse, oppose, or edit any opinion or information provided by you or another user and does not make any representation with respect to, nor does it endorse the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or reliability of any advice, opinion, statement, or other material displayed, uploaded, or distributed by you or any other user. Nevertheless, NDIA reserves the right to delete or take other action with respect to postings (or parts thereof) that NDIA believes in good faith violate this Legal Notice and/or are potentially harmful or unlawful. If you violate this Legal Notice, NDIA may, in its sole discretion, delete the unacceptable content from your posting, remove or delete the posting in its entirety, issue you a warning, and/or terminate your use of the NDIA site. Moreover, it is a policy of NDIA to take appropriate actions under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and other applicable intellectual property laws. If you become aware of postings that violate these rules regarding acceptable behavior or content, you may contact NDIA at 703.522.1820.

 

 

Bookmark and Share