Twitter Facebook Google RSS
 
National Defense > Blog > Posts > Debate Continues Over Fate of U.S. Military Gear in Afghanistan
Debate Continues Over Fate of U.S. Military Gear in Afghanistan
By Sandra I. Erwin



Defense Department officials estimate there are at least 100,000 shipping containers in Afghanistan that are packed with U.S. military weapons, equipment and supplies.

Approximately 25 percent of those boxes contain expensive hardware that the U.S. military wants to bring back after the troop drawdown is completed in 2014. The contents of the remainder 75,000 containers mostly are commercial items that the Pentagon doesn’t want to send back because the shipping costs outweigh the value of the equipment.

The cargo is still being sorted through, said Alan Estevez, assistant secretary of defense for logistics and materiel readiness. Military officials in Afghanistan have been directed to identify what equipment is essential inventory for units back home, and what is expendable.

“We do not need everything we bought for the war,” Estevez said June 13 at the National Defense Industrial Association’s logistics symposium in Arlington, Va.
“I’m not going to bring back paper plates, and I’m not going to bring back bandages,” he said.

Army officials, meanwhile, worry that the Pentagon will want to give away or leave behind equipment the service needs to replenish stocks back home. “There is still a debate in the Pentagon” about how to handle U.S. equipment in Afghanistan, said Lt. Gen. Raymond Mason, Army deputy chief of staff for logistics.

In the logistics business, he said, “We are very good at getting in, but no so good at getting out.”

The Army has about $25 billion worth of equipment in Afghanistan, and $19 billion of that should be sent back to fill shortages in stateside units, Mason said at the NDIA conference. Some gear already has made its way to the United States, he noted. A year ago, the Army’s inventory in Afghanistan was worth $28 billion.

The Army wants most of this equipment returned, Mason said. “It’s our latest and greatest stuff that we have over there,” including armored Humvee trucks, communications systems, computers and weapons.  

Defense officials are doing a cost-benefit analysis to determine whether it is worth spending up to $14 billion to send back the Army’s gear. That includes $3 billion to $5 billion in shipping expenses and $9 billion that it would cost to repair damaged equipment.

“It makes sense to bring it back,” Mason said. “I don't think we are going to have the money to buy new,” or the time to wait for new equipment to get through the Pentagon’s protracted procurement process. “For an investment of $12 to $14 billion, we get $25 billion worth of stuff,” Mason said.

Over the past 10 years, he noted, the Army spent $80 billion repairing war-torn equipment.

Estevez said exiting Afghanistan will be a tough challenge even for seasoned logisticians. Leaving Iraq was easier, he said, because the U.S. military had transportation infrastructure in Kuwait that does not exist in Afghanistan. The bulk of U.S. military gear will be ready to be returned by 2014 or 2015, following the scheduled troop drawdown, he said.

He insisted that military leaders will have to prove that equipment is essential before they receive approval and funding to ship it back. “If we don’t need it for the future force, we are not going to pay the cost of bringing it back for resetting and parking it for some future unidentified need,” he said. “Those costs are prohibitive.”

Anything that is not returned will be either given away to Afghan forces, to other allied countries, or will be destroyed. Congressional auditors in 2012 identified more than 750,000 major pieces of combat equipment in Afghanistan, such as weapons and vehicles, that could be returned to the U.S. military, transferred to another U.S. government agency or another country, or destroyed. This equipment was estimated to be worth more than $36 billion, and it could cost $5.7 billion to return or transfer equipment from Afghanistan, said Cary Russell, GAO’s acting director of defense capabilities and management. He cautioned that the military services have not consistently produced data to support their decisions concerning the return of war-zone items from Afghanistan, said Russell. “There is a risk that the costs of returning excess items may outweigh the benefits.”

Photo Credit: Defense Dept.

Comments

Re: Debate Continues Over Fate of U.S. Military Gear in Afghanistan

The question (with a decade of support still looming) is what are we doing with the inbound shipping?

With a 7 billion dollar shipping bill, this is about 3 billion in free inbound shipping. Even if we can't use this much inbound shipping, India is planning on an iron mine and steel mill. Or we could simply buy supplies the Afghanis want anyway and make at least a billion in profit.

My pitch is for this:

Afghanis use 6 million inefficient stone or mud wood stoves. These can be upgraded with insulated firebrick and better designs that use half the fuel. The materials (such as vermiculite) cost about a thousand a truckload.

The real goal is to eliminate the need for half of the brush they grow along irrigation ditches. This has been the Taliban's greatest tactical asset (trust me, I flew 220 medevac missions there). This is billions worth of security savings. It would take about two million dollars' worth of vermiculite to not only upgrade their stoves, but every brick kiln in the country.
Robert Haston at 6/18/2013 10:04 AM

Re: Debate Continues Over Fate of U.S. Military Gear in Afghanistan

I appreciate your writing. Thanks for your detail info. Here I can suggest a safety tool.
: Raporlite - The World’s Brightest Tactical Flashlight
A tactical flashlight could be your most effective weapon when it comes to self-defense. If you’re under attack, you don’t want to hesitate for a second and by using the world’s brightest tactical light you ensure you can identify the assailant immediately and take appropriate action.
Raptorlite is no ordinary flashlight. Our tactical flashlights are used by law enforcement officers and military personnel who need to use the brightest lights available on their weapons. A gun with a mounted Raptorlite allows the user to see their target clearly, even in the darkest conditions, and aim with complete accuracy.
Using a handgun in low light can be a recipe for disaster. Not only are you likely to miss your intended target, but you are also at risk of injuring anyone who may wander in front of your path if you cannot see clearly. The best tactical flashlights light up the area like daylight so you can see exactly what your gun is pointing at.
A tactical flashlight – your first line of defense
But Raptorlite tactical flashlights don’t have to be mounted to a gun in order to be a great tool for self-defense. Attackers generally don’t like to be seen and just shining this super bright light at them may be enough to deter opportunistic attacks.
If you’re planning to be out in an area that is not well lit, it makes sense to carry one of our compact LED flashlights with you. We’ve all been in situations where we feel unsafe walking in the street at night and for good reason – most attacks happen under cover of darkness. You have less chance of being mugged if there are no shadowy areas for attackers to lurk in and as the world’s brightest tactical flashlight, Raptorlite can illuminate half a mile in front of you.
Another simple but effective function of the Raptorlite tactical light is its ability to dazzle would-be attackers. As your first line of defense, shining this insanely bright light into the assailant’s eyes will disorient them and cause them to lose their vision for a few seconds, allowing you to escape or raise the alarm.
If it comes to it, you can also use our tactical flashlights as a weapon if you are attacked and have no other method of self-defense. The aggressive attack bezel can be used to strike an attacker in the face before he can make advances.
What is the best tactical flashlight?
Our flashlights are compact, making them easy to carry on your person. They’re also rechargeable so there is no risk of running out of batteries, rendering your flashlight useless. As the world’s brightest tactical flashlight, the Raptorlite is three times brighter than the nearest competitor and also the best value, at a price you’ll find hard to believe.
When it comes to your safety, there is really no excuse to settle for anything less than the best. By choosing a Raptorlite tactical LED flashlight, you can have peace of mind knowing that you are fully prepared in case of attack.
Wanna try this. Please go here (www.raptorlite.com)
Prabal Chowdhury at 9/1/2013 8:54 AM

Re: Debate Continues Over Fate of U.S. Military Gear in Afghanistan

Robert you bring up a very good point. A large proportion of the items that are likely to be dismantled, rendering them rather useless, or destroyed could be put to use in various ways to create more sustainable and economically viable solutions for the everyday problems often faced in Afghanistan.

Are these items inventoried at each base? Once the cost benefit analysis has been conducted and certain items have been marked for destruction or sale there should be a team and a strategy in place to identify potential uses of each as well as oversight of disbursement of goods.

Who is currently overseeing this initiative?
Faiz Marhami at 11/11/2013 2:41 AM

Add Comment

Items on this list require content approval. Your submission will not appear in public views until approved by someone with proper rights. More information on content approval.

Name: *

eMail *

Comment *

Title

Attachments

Name: *


eMail *


Comment *


 

Refresh
Please enter the text displayed in the image.
The picture contains 6 characters.

Characters *

  

Legal Notice *

NDIA is not responsible for screening, policing, editing, or monitoring your or another user's postings and encourages all of its users to use reasonable discretion and caution in evaluating or reviewing any posting. Moreover, and except as provided below with respect to NDIA's right and ability to delete or remove a posting (or any part thereof), NDIA does not endorse, oppose, or edit any opinion or information provided by you or another user and does not make any representation with respect to, nor does it endorse the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or reliability of any advice, opinion, statement, or other material displayed, uploaded, or distributed by you or any other user. Nevertheless, NDIA reserves the right to delete or take other action with respect to postings (or parts thereof) that NDIA believes in good faith violate this Legal Notice and/or are potentially harmful or unlawful. If you violate this Legal Notice, NDIA may, in its sole discretion, delete the unacceptable content from your posting, remove or delete the posting in its entirety, issue you a warning, and/or terminate your use of the NDIA site. Moreover, it is a policy of NDIA to take appropriate actions under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and other applicable intellectual property laws. If you become aware of postings that violate these rules regarding acceptable behavior or content, you may contact NDIA at 703.522.1820.

 

 

Bookmark and Share