Twitter Facebook Google RSS
 
National Defense > Blog > Posts > Army Carbine Competition Faces Delay, Possible Cancellation
Army Carbine Competition Faces Delay, Possible Cancellation
By Dan Parsons



The Army’s ongoing effort to replace thousands of rifles is not yet dead, though senior service leaders have hinted that it may be shut down.
 
Program Executive Office Soldier was scheduled to hold a press conference May 23 to update reporters on several equipment programs, including the effort to replace the service’s M4 rifles. Following the announcement of an audit of the program by the Defense Department’s inspector general and critical remarks by Army Secretary John McHugh, it was widely anticipated that PEO Soldier officials would announce either the cancellation or the downsizing of the carbine competition.
 
That press conference has been postponed because “senior leaders have not made any decisions,” said Debi Dawson, a spokeswoman for PEO Soldier. There is no date set for a decision, she added.

Industry executives, who declined to be identified, have told National Defense that the competition could be shut down.

McHugh told the House Armed Services Committee on April 25 that he and other Defense Department officials were questioning whether the Army had a need for a new carbine.
 
The Army has completed phase two of the competition, which was begun in 2011. That phase involved thousands of rounds being pumped through several competing rifles to test durability, reliability and accuracy. If the competition survives, plans are to select three designs that will be tested in the third and final phases that will involve hundreds of thousands of rounds fired by soldiers in field tests.
 
When phase three is complete, an analysis of alternatives is planned to determine if any of the new carbines provide enhanced capabilities that would justify the $1.8 billion planned investment to replace the M4.

Meanwhile the Pentagon’s watchdog has launched an audit of the carbine competition. A report is expected within the month that will likely include concerns over the need for replacing the Army’s current arms, according to March 19 testimony before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.
 
“We are auditing the Army’s acquisition of the individual carbine program, which is an acquisition the department may want to re-evaluate,” Lynne M. Halbrooks, the Defense Department IG’s principal deputy inspector general, testified. “We expect to report concerns that DoD may not have an established need for this weapon nor developed performance requirements for the $1.8 billion  acquisition.”
 
The Army is simultaneously in the midst of upgrading and replacing its existing carbines with the M4A1 — the special operations version of the weapon — through the M4 product improvement program. The M4A1 has a heavier barrel and a full-auto setting rather than the three-round burst setting on the M4.
 
The Army’s 2014 budget request includes plans to purchase 12,000 M4A1 carbines for just over $21 million.
 
“Currently, the Army is modifying its existing M4 rifle and, at the same time, seeking to develop a new rifle,” Halbrooks said. “However, key performance parameters such as accuracy, reliability and lethality have not been established. In addition, it is unclear what additional capability this new rifle will have over the modified M4. Further, the Army is seeking to acquire more rifles during a time when their total force structure will be reduced.”
 
Manufacturers Colt and FNH have made some improvements to the M4 and M16 based on lessons learned in combat in Iraq and Afghanistan. The rifles currently in use on the whole have heavier barrels than the weapon’s original design. Heavier barrels improve accuracy, allow a higher rate of sustained fire and prevent corrosion and damage.
 
The rifles competing to replace the M4 are: the Adcor Defense BEAR Elite; the Colt ACC-M (sometimes called the ACM); FNH USA's FNAC; the Heckler & Koch HK416: the Remington ACR; and the ARX160 rifle made by Beretta USA Corp.
 
The designs generally follow one of two paths — an evolutionary version of the M16 upper and lower receiver assemblies with modified barrel and accessories, or a fresh-start design that resembles the AR-15 but relies heavily on polymer plastics and tweaks to the weapon’s operating system to improve accuracy, ergonomics and modularity.
 
The H&K, Colt and Adcor designs are each evolutions of the basic M4 carbine. FNH USA, Beretta and Remington have taken the latter path, integrating much of the M16 architecture, but using more polymer materials and fine-tuning the rifle’s operating system and ergonomics.
 
All of the contenders incorporate several improvements over the current rifle, many of which are quickly becoming industry standard elements that satisfy the desires of both military and civilian shooters. Those are monolithic upper receivers with free-floating barrels and a piston operating system.
 
The HK416 is already in use by some Marine Corps and Army Special Forces units. The rifle’s receiver and action are almost identical to the M4, for which it is offered as a conversion kit. That option could shave costs off a large-scale purchase, because existing lower receivers can be used.

Photo Credit: Army

Comments

Re: Army Carbine Competition Faces Delay, Possible Cancellation

The replacements for the M4 will not be much of an improvement as long as we retain the obsolescent 5.56 cartridge.  The limitations of current rifles is more due to the limitations of the ammunition than the rifle itself.

Back in 2004 a company came up with an improvement to the M16 series rifle that produced a huge increase in accuracy, better range and better stopping power simply by replacing the upper receiver with one that accepted a 6.8mm cartridge.  This design exceeded all the Army's specs for an improved battle rifle but was rejected because it did not use the 5.56mm round.
Colin at 5/23/2013 5:17 PM

Add Comment

Items on this list require content approval. Your submission will not appear in public views until approved by someone with proper rights. More information on content approval.

Name: *

eMail *

Comment *

Title

Attachments

Name: *


eMail *


Comment *


 

Refresh
Please enter the text displayed in the image.
The picture contains 6 characters.

Characters *

  

Legal Notice *

NDIA is not responsible for screening, policing, editing, or monitoring your or another user's postings and encourages all of its users to use reasonable discretion and caution in evaluating or reviewing any posting. Moreover, and except as provided below with respect to NDIA's right and ability to delete or remove a posting (or any part thereof), NDIA does not endorse, oppose, or edit any opinion or information provided by you or another user and does not make any representation with respect to, nor does it endorse the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or reliability of any advice, opinion, statement, or other material displayed, uploaded, or distributed by you or any other user. Nevertheless, NDIA reserves the right to delete or take other action with respect to postings (or parts thereof) that NDIA believes in good faith violate this Legal Notice and/or are potentially harmful or unlawful. If you violate this Legal Notice, NDIA may, in its sole discretion, delete the unacceptable content from your posting, remove or delete the posting in its entirety, issue you a warning, and/or terminate your use of the NDIA site. Moreover, it is a policy of NDIA to take appropriate actions under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and other applicable intellectual property laws. If you become aware of postings that violate these rules regarding acceptable behavior or content, you may contact NDIA at 703.522.1820.

 

 

Bookmark and Share