Twitter Facebook Google RSS
National Defense > Blog > Posts > Tech Industry Warns Defense Policies Threaten to Stifle Innovation
Tech Industry Warns Defense Policies Threaten to Stifle Innovation
By Sandra I. Erwin

The U.S. military has ambitious plans to deploy global information networks and equip troops with mobile devices that provide up-to-the-minute intelligence. These goals will be hard to achieve, however, because of outdated security policies and procurement methods, information-technology experts said.

Most of the products that the military needs exist in the commercial IT sector, and technologies such as mobile and cloud computing are advancing rapidly. But the culture of government, which puts secrecy ahead of sharing, is incompatible with commercial practices, said John M. Custer, a retired Army major general and director of federal strategic missions and programs at EMC Corp.

“Sharing is a dirty word to many people,” especially inside the Beltway, Custer said at an IT industry conference in Arlington, Va., hosted by Thermopylae Sciences and Technology.

The technology world is moving to cloud and mobile, where sharing is paramount, Custer said. As a senior officer at U.S. Central Command in 2006, Custer was overseeing information systems and was struck by the difficulties in sharing data with allied commanders. The CENTCOM commander at the time, Army Gen. John Abizaid, wrote a letter to the Joint Chiefs of Staff asking for permission to let seven British generals access the SIPRNet (secure Internet protocol router network), which is restricted to users with secret security clearances. The request was declined, Custer recalled. “The answer we got was, ‘spend a couple million dollars and build a SIPRNet light. Populate this new network so the British officers will have the same information that is on the SIPRNet.”

That response captures the challenges faced by military commanders in the field who must work with partners and be able to exchange data, Custer said. “Policy and sharing are two different worlds,” he added. “There are many more people who worry about over sharing than under sharing.”

The way it typically works, he said, the operators in the field want to share, while the policy makers inhibit. “That's not universal, but it's been the paradigm,” he said. “It has dramatically changed over the past decade, but there are still a great deal of organizations that own a lot of information they don't want to share.”

A.J. Clark, CEO of Thermopylae, said there are pockets of innovation in the military, although the Pentagon is still not able to fully take advantage of what commercial industry can offer. One of his company’s clients, U.S. Southern Command, has adjusted its intelligence operations so that more information can be shared with Latin American military allies and civilian partners in areas such as humanitarian relief, counternarcotics and human trafficking detection, said Clark. The military excels at traditional intelligence collection methods such as overhead imagery and airborne electronic warfare. But being good at flying airplanes and launching satellites is not enough anymore, Clark said. “What we have is Google and social networks,” he said. “How are we turning that advance in technology the United States is good at against our adversaries? It's lagging a little bit.”

The intelligence community, he said, is starting to see the scope and quality of real-time information that is available out there on unclassified networks. The next step is figuring out how to take this information and start aggregating it, he said. SOUTHCOM already is moving in that direction.

The latest Google cloud products are better, in terms of security, than what many government agencies have, Clark said. The challenge for the government is that, to make the best use of commercial cloud systems, it has to decide what information needs to be secure or classified, instead of trying to protect everything. After the latest wave of federal budget cuts, the government might not be able to afford to build its own clouds and will have to increasingly rely on much less expensive commercial alternatives, he said.

Companies such as Google fiercely protect their intellectual property and have invested billions of dollars in secure clouds. There is no logical reason why the government could not take advantage of this technology, said Michele Weslander-Quaid, chief technology officer at Google Federal. “From a policy perspective, the government has to catch up with best practices,” she said.

Saving money is one motivation to adopt commercial technologies. But there is another, arguably more significant reason, said Clark, which is the need to retain skilled programmers and software engineers. His company specializes in Web-based geospatial systems, mobile software applications and cloud computing. This sector is seeing a government “brain drain,” primarily of people under 30 who regard government contracting work as a hindrance to their careers and are opting for new opportunities in the commercial world, said Clark. “They expect cloud and API [application programming interface],” he said. “In our company we struggle to continue to bring a level of excellence inside the Beltway that is equivalent to what Google and Amazon have.” Retaining the best talent is a daily battle, he said. “We constantly have to encourage our developers, ‘It's OK, don't get frustrated, the government is getting there. Don't fret because they don't have any APIs.’”

Clark sees this is a worrisome trend. “What I have seen is a brain drain from this city,” he said. “Folks from MIT and Carnegie Mellon, with security clearances, are leaving for startups in Silicon Valley. They don't care if they lose their clearance. They don't want to work in this space again. It's not creative,” said Clark. “We are bankrupting ourselves and not creating technical depth for the future,” he said. “It's important for the Department of Defense and the intelligence community to ensure the next generation of developers stay interested in this mission.”

Thermopylae is one of many companies that is seeking to grow its defense business by offering commercial products that can be customized for government use. The geospatial imagery is a “fantastic market,” said John Isaac Clark, the company’s chief innovation officer. One of the newest products, called Google Liquid Galaxy, takes generic Google Earth and mapping data and creates an immersive dome-like digital environment that can be used to plan military operations or track drones flying over a battlefield. It can be set up for under $10,000, compared to traditional military “caves” that might cost hundreds of thousands of dollars. The Air Force set up a system like this to monitor U-2 spy aircraft surveillance missions. “A user in the field with a laptop talks to the bird and sees what it sees,” he said.

The government has an opportunity to save billions of dollars over time simply by transitioning legacy geo-intelligence systems to commercial technology, John Clark said. “The intelligence community is over saturated with tools that bring duplication and force users to have to understand eight different ways to interact and do the same job function.” Google is not cheap, but it brings efficiency, he said. “It's one common way we all know how to look at geo data. Why pay for others?” And when analysts receive new imagery, it should not have to be copied to eight separate workstations. That adds up to huge operations and sustainment cost.”

Photo Credit: Thinkstock, Google


Re: Tech Industry Warns Defense Policies Threaten to Stifle Innovation

Excellent article and to the point.  We have seen a decade trend of moving away from commercial best practices and innovations that has driven up program cost while undermining incentives for innovators.   In today's fiscal climate, DoD cannot afford this mentality that drives costly custom solution that are void of commercial innovations (COTS, Open Source).  DoD represents less than 1% of the global IT market valued at $3.8Trillion, thus, not a driving force.   

The IT Acquisition Advisory Council, speaking for 16 of the countries top IT communities of practice, is offering an alternative approach that favors the innovator.
John Weiler, CIO, IT Acquisition Advisory Council at 3/27/2013 10:09 PM

Re: Tech Industry Warns Defense Policies Threaten to Stifle Innovation

Very nice - a long-term problem for certain. I would simply like to add that the culture and methods are not just negatively impacting adoption of existing commercial systems, which is terrible for obvious reasons--the government then falls behind rest of world with IT that is already commoditized, but critically important is that we have observed the status quo protecting relationships to include internal and external in preventing adoption of technologies that can provide a competitive advantage. If anyone needs a competitive advantage--which they do in certain sectors of course, it's the DoD and Intel.

What troubles me more than anything is the impact from the protectionism behind the beltway-- the often toxic relationships. It doesn't breed trust with everyone else. No one--not even the DoD and budget--is large enough or powerful enough over the long-term to turn away much needed innovation, but that is precisely what has been taking place due to the dysfunction in the procurement process and unhealthy relationships therein.

Many of the regulations in contracting were obviously written by lobbyists with one mission--often directly counter to the U.S.
Mark Montgomery at 3/28/2013 4:08 PM

Re: Tech Industry Warns Defense Policies Threaten to Stifle Innovation

The situation is actually worse than many realize. I authored two books, published in 2012, on the subject of China's S&T ecosystem, cyber-rape of Western technologies and their knowledge innovation strategy. Let me state for the community at large that China has a 30-year head start in being able to rapidly assimilate what they acquire, by whatever means, to dual-use benefit because of their knowledge dominance endeavors. This threat was hidden in plain sight all along and represents the ultimate of Sun Tzu thinking. China WILL be indiginously innovative before 2020 as OECD predicts they will become the leading economy soon.
David A. Scott, PhD, JD at 3/29/2013 9:02 AM

Re: Tech Industry Warns Defense Policies Threaten to Stifle Innovation

I have written a whitepaper Call To Action for Industry to hold "Industry Solutions Jam" Sessions, which are local, 2-hour discussion sessions allowing government and industry to discuss best practices wrapped around a specific challenge.

Currently, I am hosting an Industry Solutions Jam session on LEED Points and Sustainability -- and the energy team members inside the govt locally -- are attending.

This is grass roots stuff - and industry needs to be innovative in the way they reach out to their potential end users. They need to partner up and lead share - and be willing to have open conversations.

Organizations such as NDIA need to take their trade show budgets - that have disappeared - and push the investment into their local chapters and get their businesses and federal members together - to talk -- in these inexpensive "Industry Solution Jam" sessions. This is not a capabilities briefing or boring round table. It is a conversation wrapped around a challenge the government executives are facing right now and they want to listen in on industry's ideas - and share.

If you'd like a copy of this whitepaper, feel free to reach out.

Eileen Kent, Your Federal Sales Sherpa - Custom Keynotes, LLC

Eileen Kent at 3/29/2013 10:41 AM

Add Comment

Items on this list require content approval. Your submission will not appear in public views until approved by someone with proper rights. More information on content approval.

Name: *

eMail *

Comment *



Name: *

eMail *

Comment *


Please enter the text displayed in the image.
The picture contains 6 characters.

Characters *


Legal Notice *

NDIA is not responsible for screening, policing, editing, or monitoring your or another user's postings and encourages all of its users to use reasonable discretion and caution in evaluating or reviewing any posting. Moreover, and except as provided below with respect to NDIA's right and ability to delete or remove a posting (or any part thereof), NDIA does not endorse, oppose, or edit any opinion or information provided by you or another user and does not make any representation with respect to, nor does it endorse the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or reliability of any advice, opinion, statement, or other material displayed, uploaded, or distributed by you or any other user. Nevertheless, NDIA reserves the right to delete or take other action with respect to postings (or parts thereof) that NDIA believes in good faith violate this Legal Notice and/or are potentially harmful or unlawful. If you violate this Legal Notice, NDIA may, in its sole discretion, delete the unacceptable content from your posting, remove or delete the posting in its entirety, issue you a warning, and/or terminate your use of the NDIA site. Moreover, it is a policy of NDIA to take appropriate actions under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and other applicable intellectual property laws. If you become aware of postings that violate these rules regarding acceptable behavior or content, you may contact NDIA at 703.522.1820.



Bookmark and Share