Twitter Facebook Google RSS
 
Homeland Security News 

Coast Guard Considering Permanent Bases in Arctic 

2,012 

By Stew Magnuson 

The Coast Guard will for the first time dispatch one of its new National Security Cutters to the Arctic as the ice breaks up on Alaska’s North Slope this summer.

Could permanent bases be far behind?

Long-term operations in the frigid climate will require shore-based infrastructure, Adm. Robert J. Papp Jr., commandant of the Coast Guard said in interviews the week he delivered his annual State of the Coast Guard address.

“I’m going to identify the needs, and I’m going to talk about them,” he told Pentagon media outlets.

Earlier, he announced that the Bertholf — one of the service’s three new NSC ships capable of plying deep waters on the high seas — will be operating in the Arctic this summer.

This move coincides with Shell Oil’s plans to begin drilling operations off the North Slope. The company will have 33 ships in the area and fly in 250 workers a week to the drilling platforms. The Bertholf will serve as a “movable operations center” that can do search and rescue and carry out the service’s pollution control mission.

The Coast Guard has had a presence in Alaska since 1867, but has had a short history on the remote North Slope, which is some 800 miles north of its Alaska shore-based facilities to the south. The changing climate has meant that “there is water where there wasn’t water before,” as Papp’s predecessor, Adm. Thad Allen, often said. He spearheaded early efforts to send ships to the region. For four summers, legacy cutters have been in the area.

Not having any shore-based infrastructure makes operations there difficult has been one lesson learned, Papp said. For example, aviation fuel turns to jelly in extreme cold and Coast Guard helicopters do not have any heaters for their fuel tanks.

Along with oil drilling, the breaking up of the ice in the region will bring more tourists, shipping and commercial fishing, Papp added.

The high-profile mission for the Bertholf comes at a time when the service is fighting to complete the National Security Cutter fleet. The fiscal year 2013 budget proposal includes the building of a sixth cutter, but doesn’t provide preliminary funding for the seventh and eighth ships.

There is also some funding — $8 million — to begin work on a new polar ice breaker. Updating the service’s Arctic ice breakers has been a longtime goal of Coast Guard leadership. The Coast Guard once had eight ice breakers, but it is now down to one operational ship, Papp noted. There is also $6.1 million in the budget to upgrade facilities in Cold Bay and Sitkinak, Alaska, near the Bering Sea and Aleutian Chain. There are no funds yet for permanent bases on the Arctic side of the state, though.

The expansion of operations in the Arctic comes during “stormy times,” said Papp, referring to the impending budget cuts. The service is facing the loss of 1,000 personnel, he said. It is decommissioning several older ships, and closing some Great Lakes facilities.

“Coast Guardsmen require modern ships,” he said, reiterating what he has stated in recent speeches about the service needing to sustain the gains it has made deploying high-endurance aircraft and ships to patrol large expanses of open waters such as the Pacific and Arctic.

Reader Comments

Re: Coast Guard Considering Permanent Bases in Arctic

The Coast Guard definitely needs new icebreakers. It's a shame and a pity that the two Polar Sea-class icebreakers are 40 years old. The two new icebreaking ships...the bouy tender in the Great Lakes, and the USS Healy, aren't dedicated icebreakers per se---one's a maintenance ship and the other is a research ship.

If the U.S. Coast Guard is to continue and expand Polar operations, then it needs the proper ships and equipment to do the job.

P on 03/25/2012 at 15:23

Re: Coast Guard Considering Permanent Bases in Arctic

Will Canada and Russia also have a presence?

Geo on 03/15/2012 at 11:20

Submit Your Reader's Comment Below
*Name
 
*eMail
 
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
*Comments
 
 
Refresh
Please enter the text displayed in the image.
The picture contains 6 characters.
*Characters
  
*Legal Notice

NDIA is not responsible for screening, policing, editing, or monitoring your or another user's postings and encourages all of its users to use reasonable discretion and caution in evaluating or reviewing any posting. Moreover, and except as provided below with respect to NDIA's right and ability to delete or remove a posting (or any part thereof), NDIA does not endorse, oppose, or edit any opinion or information provided by you or another user and does not make any representation with respect to, nor does it endorse the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or reliability of any advice, opinion, statement, or other material displayed, uploaded, or distributed by you or any other user. Nevertheless, NDIA reserves the right to delete or take other action with respect to postings (or parts thereof) that NDIA believes in good faith violate this Legal Notice and/or are potentially harmful or unlawful. If you violate this Legal Notice, NDIA may, in its sole discretion, delete the unacceptable content from your posting, remove or delete the posting in its entirety, issue you a warning, and/or terminate your use of the NDIA site. Moreover, it is a policy of NDIA to take appropriate actions under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and other applicable intellectual property laws. If you become aware of postings that violate these rules regarding acceptable behavior or content, you may contact NDIA at 703.522.1820.

 
 
  Bookmark and Share