Twitter Facebook Google RSS
 
Helicopters 

Army Special Operations Command Wants Speedier Helicopters 

2,011 

By Grace V. Jean 

One of the biggest drawbacks of helicopters is that they are slow, which makes them vulnerable to enemy fire. U.S. special operations units, which recently suffered a historic loss when Taliban fighters downed a Chinook helicopter, killing 30 U.S. troops, including 22 Navy Seals, would greatly benefit from faster choppers.

“One hundred and seventy knots is not enough,” said Army Col. Douglas Rombough, the program executive officer for rotary wing at U.S. Special Operations Command. “We have to have a minimum of 200 knots capability. After you add all the things you like to add to the outside of that aircraft to make it shoot, move, communicate, with all the drag out there, we need to be proceeding to the objective at 200 knots or better.”

SOCOM helicopters are rapidly wearing down after a decade of nonstop operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. Military rotary-wing aircraft typically remain in service for a 20-year lifespan. But in the case of special operations forces, which fly helicopters at higher gross weights, the aircraft are only making it to the 15-year mark because of heavy usage in the wars, officials said.

Despite an extensive modernization program under way to recapitalize the vertical lift fleet, Army special operations officials have said that they cannot meet future operational requirements with upgrades alone.

Only new designs can achieve the speed, endurance, range and payload that operators want, officials said. Systems also are needed to reduce pilot workload.

“We’ve got to go through a whole new process. We need game changer-type stuff for all those reasons,” Rombough said at a special operations industry conference.

Conventional forces, too, are eyeing new aircraft. Army officials have said that the service’s rotary aircraft fleet by 2030 will have reached the ends of its useful life.

Finding replacement aircraft means technology development must start now.

In 2009, then-Defense Secretary Robert Gates mandated that all the services begin looking at future joint rotary-wing lift requirements. They came up with four classes of joint multi-role aircraft: heavy, medium, light and ultra light.

At the conference, Rombough presented a PowerPoint briefing with slides that illustrated some deficiencies of the OH-58D Kiowa Warrior armed reconnaissance helicopter. It cannot operate in 60 percent of the areas in Afghanistan, which is known for unforgiving flying conditions with rugged terrain, high altitudes and dusty environments. The new joint multi-role aircraft will have to provide drastic improvements over that current capability, he said. That includes increasing hover altitude by 150 percent, increasing payload by 40 percent, and doubling mission speed and endurance. Special operators also want to reduce acoustic detection by 50 percent and cut in half the aircraft’s turning radius.

In the meantime, Army special operations aviation forces are in the final stretch of modernizing their rotary-wing fleets. When the process is completed in 2015, the fleet will be composed of 192 aircraft and three variants: the MH-60M Black Hawk, the MH-47G Chinook and the MH-6M Little Bird.

The 2010 Quadrennial Defense Review called for an additional MH-47G company. That effort will begin in 2013 and will be completed in 2015, when the fleet will comprise 69 Chinook aircraft, said Brig. Gen. Kevin Mangum, commander of the Army Special Operations Aviation Command. The new M-model Blackhawks, too, will finish fielding by 2015, he added.

U.S. Army Special Operations Command will also have a fleet of nearly 300 unmanned systems, to include the RQ-7 Shadow, and the MQ-1C Gray Eagle, derived from the Air Force’s family of Predator and Reaper remotely piloted aircraft.            

Reader Comments

Re: Army Special Operations Command Wants Speedier Helicopters

The AH-56 Cheyenne was the best replacement for aging conventional helos at the time back in the 70s. Misguided Army logic and contract fraud led us to living the dream with these aging designs. Current designs are pigs in the mountains and they need to be retired in favor of the faster compound helicopters.

rocket64 on 11/14/2011 at 11:25

Re: Army Special Operations Command Wants Speedier Helicopters

Take a look at the Hexplane at Olivervtol.com site. The solution we have been looking for has been analyzed and validated by experts. Hexplane can carry its payload over 200% faster and 200% father than helicopters and do it with an amazing redundancy. Hexplane's high altitude performance exceeds that of most helicopters.

Richard Oliver on 09/07/2011 at 17:09

Re: Army Special Operations Command Wants Speedier Helicopters

I am sure that a Stovl Jet system would be the way to go. Why mess around with a system that is outdated and has at best a max speed of 480 km. A Stovl Fan system with a Jet is going to give you good speed and they could make it stealthy. The major problem is Cash. I think better anti rocket measures would be the way to go economically.

darragh scully on 08/22/2011 at 11:04

Re: Army Special Operations Command Wants Speedier Helicopters

Helicopters are never going to be that fast because there are a number of conflicting requirements. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helicopter#Limitations

sluggobuggo on 08/18/2011 at 02:43

Re: Army Special Operations Command Wants Speedier Helicopters

Was the CH-47 flying into a HOT LZ situation without gunship support? If it only had M240's then it probably was a sitting duck. Was the aircraft shot down in the daytime or at night? The aircraft is too large to be flying into hot LZ's with out gunship suppressive fire. The problem is the CH-47 is the only Army helicopter that can operate at altitude in Afghanistan. This was a mission for a flight of Blackhawks with gunship support if they had the performance to operate in the area.

William McQuade on 08/17/2011 at 16:41

Re: Army Special Operations Command Wants Speedier Helicopters

What exactly is a speedier helicopter going to give you? 170 knts vs. 200 knts. You are still going to get the shit kicked out of you when you land or take off. A V-22 would have been shot down even easier than a Chinook on that mission (no defensive weapons). What the Military needs figure out how to protect it's current aircraft better. The Chinook on that mission was armed with normal M240H machine guns. If it had Miniguns like a Special Ops birds, that might have made a difference is suppressing enemy fire.

Rod Bertrand on 08/17/2011 at 12:37

Re: Army Special Operations Command Wants Speedier Helicopters

Top speed is not the problem. Helicopters in Afghanistan are not being shot down in flight. They get hit during approach for landing and after takeoff while transitioning to forward flight. They need to figure out how to armor helicopters without add significant weight.

J. Dvorak on 08/17/2011 at 12:15

Re: Army Special Operations Command Wants Speedier Helicopters

This is exactly the argument I make in my book "How the Helicopter Changed Modern Warfare". The recent Osama victory and the tragedy of August 6 bear me out. Walter Boyne

Walter Boyne on 08/15/2011 at 21:31

Submit Your Reader's Comment Below
*Name
 
*eMail
 
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
*Comments
 
 
Refresh
Please enter the text displayed in the image.
The picture contains 6 characters.
*Characters
  
*Legal Notice

NDIA is not responsible for screening, policing, editing, or monitoring your or another user's postings and encourages all of its users to use reasonable discretion and caution in evaluating or reviewing any posting. Moreover, and except as provided below with respect to NDIA's right and ability to delete or remove a posting (or any part thereof), NDIA does not endorse, oppose, or edit any opinion or information provided by you or another user and does not make any representation with respect to, nor does it endorse the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or reliability of any advice, opinion, statement, or other material displayed, uploaded, or distributed by you or any other user. Nevertheless, NDIA reserves the right to delete or take other action with respect to postings (or parts thereof) that NDIA believes in good faith violate this Legal Notice and/or are potentially harmful or unlawful. If you violate this Legal Notice, NDIA may, in its sole discretion, delete the unacceptable content from your posting, remove or delete the posting in its entirety, issue you a warning, and/or terminate your use of the NDIA site. Moreover, it is a policy of NDIA to take appropriate actions under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and other applicable intellectual property laws. If you become aware of postings that violate these rules regarding acceptable behavior or content, you may contact NDIA at 703.522.1820.

 
 
  Bookmark and Share