Security Beat 

Domestic Unpiloted Aircraft May Use ‘Tunneling’ to Fly in National Airspace 

2,011 

By Stew Magnuson 

While unmanned aerial vehicles are common in the skies above Afghanistan and Iraq, they have been flown sparingly in the United States because of strict Federal Aviation Administration rules regulating national airspace.

Police agencies would like to use remotely controlled aircraft to monitor cities. Customs and Border Protection has employed them along the U.S. borders with Mexico and Canada, but the Department of Homeland Security would like to expand their applications by flying them to disaster zones in times of emergency.

Standing in their way is the FAA, which has a duty to prevent aviation-related accidents.
One of the key sticking points has been the ability of the remotely piloted aircraft to sense and avoid other aircraft or obstacles in low altitudes.

The Army may have a solution to the problem.

A ground-based system of radars or other sensors peering up at the UAV and the airspace surrounding it could help escort a pilotless aircraft to its destination, said Viva Austin, product director for unmanned systems airspace integration concepts at the Army aviation bureau.

The concept is called “tunneling,” which requires the setting up of safe corridors through airways and the pre-placement of sensors at points along the way. If an object is detected, the radar nodes would send a command to the UAV for it to move out of harm’s way.

Previous concepts called for placing sensors aboard the aircraft. The military has been working on onboard solutions for years, but so far no technologies have emerged that fit the FAA’s stringent requirements.

The military has a pressing need to access national airspace. With the war in Iraq winding down, and the Afghan conflict possibly ending by 2014, all four services will need to train future remotely piloted aircraft operators at domestic bases.

“We don’t meet the federal regulations to fly in the national airspace,” Austin said. “We need to expand access.”

The office of the secretary of defense has set up an unmanned aerial systems task force to address the problem. The Army has the lead for the ground-based sense-and-avoid system.

“It’s not just getting out to the airspace and doing whatever we want,” she said. Military aircraft would have to stick to these tunnels when moving from one restricted airspace to another.

Civilian agencies such as CBP and NASA have shared data with the task force to help the effort, Austin said.

For now, the office is working on a basic system of ground-based radars. A second-generation version of the program would have to integrate with other airborne and space-based sensors, as well as the next-generation air transportation system, which is an FAA program to modernize the nation’s air traffic control system, she said.

Reader Comments

Re: Domestic Unpiloted Aircraft May Use ‘Tunneling’ to Fly in National Airspace

I clearly remember 'inheriting' an A-10, a jet with nearly the best possible views in all directions. 'My' jet had recently ran over and killed a powered sailplane when the Hog's pilot descended onto the glider. The jet had no visibility immediately below and the glider pilot apparently, as is quite normal, didn't look up.

But both of them met standards.

Frankly, I trust even today's sense and avoid technology more than I do almost any pilot in almost any plane.

Ed Herlik on 03/08/2011 at 18:27

Re: Domestic Unpiloted Aircraft May Use ‘Tunneling’ to Fly in National Airspace

The difficulty with the approach being used by the RTCA and other committees is that no one wants to be held accountable if an aircraft incident occurs due to less-than-perfect specs for the Sense & Avoid system. When they put really tough requirements on such a system, it becomes prohibitively expensive to build if one could even design such a system. Yet manned aircraft continue to use a Sense & Avoid system that is inattentive, has a narrow effective field-of-view, is distracted, and is blind in most directions. If the problem were redefined as: “How can we assist manned and unmanned aircraft in avoiding collisions,…” then there would be a lot of cost-effective solutions. An on-board, automated Sense & Avoid system for unmanned aircraft could easily be safer than manned aircraft in many flight regimes.

Tom Milkie
Dir, Sense & Avoid Systems
SARA, Inc

Tom Milkie on 02/16/2011 at 10:22

Re: Domestic Unpiloted Aircraft May Use ‘Tunneling’ to Fly in National Airspace

RTCA SC-203 has been working on "sense and avoid" requirements for years. UAS can't conform to 14 CFR 91.113 with respect to see and avoid or following any other rules of the road that apply to every other aircraft in the sky, and most are too small to be seen and avoided by other aircraft. So, it seems like the FAA has a pretty good idea of what's needed but the military can't comply, so they're pushing to do what they want anyway.

Jurgen on 02/16/2011 at 09:40

Re: Domestic Unpiloted Aircraft May Use ‘Tunneling’ to Fly in National Airspace

"The military has been working on onboard solutions for years, but so far no technologies have emerged that fit the FAA’s stringent requirements."

Really? What are those "stringent requirements?" Because I think the FAA can't get out of its own way to figure out what those requirements are.

Matt on 02/16/2011 at 02:46

Submit Your Reader's Comment Below
*Name
 
*eMail
 
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
*Comments
 
 
Refresh
Please enter the text displayed in the image.
The picture contains 6 characters.
*Characters
  
*Legal Notice

NDIA is not responsible for screening, policing, editing, or monitoring your or another user's postings and encourages all of its users to use reasonable discretion and caution in evaluating or reviewing any posting. Moreover, and except as provided below with respect to NDIA's right and ability to delete or remove a posting (or any part thereof), NDIA does not endorse, oppose, or edit any opinion or information provided by you or another user and does not make any representation with respect to, nor does it endorse the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or reliability of any advice, opinion, statement, or other material displayed, uploaded, or distributed by you or any other user. Nevertheless, NDIA reserves the right to delete or take other action with respect to postings (or parts thereof) that NDIA believes in good faith violate this Legal Notice and/or are potentially harmful or unlawful. If you violate this Legal Notice, NDIA may, in its sole discretion, delete the unacceptable content from your posting, remove or delete the posting in its entirety, issue you a warning, and/or terminate your use of the NDIA site. Moreover, it is a policy of NDIA to take appropriate actions under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and other applicable intellectual property laws. If you become aware of postings that violate these rules regarding acceptable behavior or content, you may contact NDIA at 703.522.1820.

 
 
  Bookmark and Share