Twitter Facebook Google RSS
 
Homeland Security News 

DHS Considers Reviving Dormant Joint Requirements Council 

12  2,011 

By Stew Magnuson 

Nothing is more maddening to budget hawks and government watchdogs than two different agencies setting out to purchase the same technology in separate acquisition programs.

The Defense Department has struggled with that problem for years and set up mechanisms in the now defunct Joint Operations Command to eliminate unnecessary duplications that waste taxpayer dollars.

The Department of Homeland Security, with 22 agencies brought together by congressional mandate, unsurprisingly suffers from the same problem.

In 2004, it set up a Joint Requirements Council in an effort to eliminate duplication, and sometimes, triplications of efforts within the department.

Its life was brief, though.

By 2006, its chair had been reassigned to other duties and the council stopped meeting, Charles K. Edwards, acting DHS inspector general, said before the House Homeland Security Committee’s transportation subcommittee.

For example, DHS has eight different procurement offices that purchase the various types of detection equipment that screens people, vehicles, baggage and other objects for contraband. Customs and Border Protection, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the Coast Guard and the Transportation Security Administration are among them. The eight components purchased $3.2 billion worth of detectors in fiscal year 2010. The IG identified $170 million worth of x-ray machines, metal detectors and hand-held devices that DHS could have purchased and their costs shared among the agencies.

“There is no mechanism in place for components to standardize equipment purchases or identify common mission requirements among components,” Edwards said.

Commodity councils are another solution. In that case, each agency supplies an expert on a particular type of technology to a group that meets to see where they can carry out joint acquisitions, he said.

Meanwhile, the department is evaluating the re-establishment of the Joint Requirements Council, he added.

Submit Your Reader's Comment Below
*Name
 
*eMail
 
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
*Comments
 
 
Refresh
Please enter the text displayed in the image.
The picture contains 6 characters.
*Characters
  
*Legal Notice

NDIA is not responsible for screening, policing, editing, or monitoring your or another user's postings and encourages all of its users to use reasonable discretion and caution in evaluating or reviewing any posting. Moreover, and except as provided below with respect to NDIA's right and ability to delete or remove a posting (or any part thereof), NDIA does not endorse, oppose, or edit any opinion or information provided by you or another user and does not make any representation with respect to, nor does it endorse the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or reliability of any advice, opinion, statement, or other material displayed, uploaded, or distributed by you or any other user. Nevertheless, NDIA reserves the right to delete or take other action with respect to postings (or parts thereof) that NDIA believes in good faith violate this Legal Notice and/or are potentially harmful or unlawful. If you violate this Legal Notice, NDIA may, in its sole discretion, delete the unacceptable content from your posting, remove or delete the posting in its entirety, issue you a warning, and/or terminate your use of the NDIA site. Moreover, it is a policy of NDIA to take appropriate actions under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and other applicable intellectual property laws. If you become aware of postings that violate these rules regarding acceptable behavior or content, you may contact NDIA at 703.522.1820.

 
 
  Bookmark and Share