Security Beat 

Monitoring Small Vessels Still a Challenge for Coast Guard, Says GAO 

2,010 

By Stew Magnuson and Ashleigh Fugate 

The Department of Homeland Security has spent billions of dollars on technology and databases to defend against the illicit transportation of nuclear or radiological material in shipping containers.

Former Coast Guard Commandant Thad Allen stated in testimony before Congress that small vessels, however, pose a greater threat for nuclear smuggling than large container ships.

The Government Accountability Office has found that few resources are being devoted to the small vessel threat.

Small vessels, generally defined as being under 40 tons, are hard to monitor and track, noted GAO’s Stephen Caldwell, director of homeland security and justice issues. They can be used to smuggle terrorists into the United States, as water-borne improvised explosive devices, a standoff platform for launching attacks, and the aforementioned scenario where weapons — conventional or unconventional — are snuck into U.S. waters.

DHS released a Small Vessel Security Strategy more than two years ago, but it has been in bureaucratic limbo ever since. It was recently sent to the Office of Budget and Management where it awaits approval, Caldwell told the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation.

Two Coast Guard pilot programs that tested tracking systems could not adequately detect small vessels, Caldwell added. Some, but not all, ports have radars and cameras in place that can track small boats, but they do not always work in bad weather or at night, he noted.

There is “widespread agreement among maritime stakeholders that it is very difficult to detect threatening activity by small vessels without prior knowledge of a planned attack,” Caldwell added.

In addition, a community outreach plan that would have asked boaters to look out for suspicious activity and report it to authorities, America’s Waterway Watch, lost its funding.

Meanwhile, a three-year DHS pilot program that uses sensors to detect nuclear and radiological materials in small boats is wrapping up this year, Caldwell said. Initial feedback from users has been positive, he added.

Reader Comments

Re: Monitoring Small Vessels Still a Challenge for Coast Guard, Says GAO

A Navy contractor has worked this problem and proved out a very compact and simple design radar which can detect any moving small radar cross-section (>1 m^2 approx.) boats. Last April, we have detected and tracked three dolphins swimming side by side 200 meters off the coast of California with our non-moving (with no mechanical moving parts, no scanning electronics) small aperture, low power radar sitting about 40 feet above water. You can contact me if there is any interest .

Phuc Nguyen on 09/13/2010 at 15:28

Re: Monitoring Small Vessels Still a Challenge for Coast Guard, Says GAO

great thinking. any more potential targets you want to advertise?

steve white on 09/13/2010 at 14:25

Re: Monitoring Small Vessels Still a Challenge for Coast Guard, Says GAO

I have been concerned about terrorism using very small boats for a very long time. I spent an aggregate of 36 years with the Missile Division of General Dynamics (GD) and then Hughes Missile after Hughes acquired that part of General Dynamics.

When I first went to work for GD in 1956 there was a nuclear version of the Terrier Surface to Air Missile (SAM). I have no idea of the yield (probably around 20 KT) but the fuze and device would have to be under 500 lb to be compatible with the regular warhead. Its diameter tapering from 13.5 inches and its length under four ft. I am also somewhat familiar with the sub KT devices which were to be used in the Project Orion space vehicle proposed by the General Atomic Division of General Dynamics having extensively used their explosive test site for a number of my projects.

My wife and I took a vacation to the Canadian Maritimes late one spring. At one of the ports we observed small boats lined up to be checked by Canadian Customs Authorities after presumably crossing the North Atlantic from Europe. While small they had RADARs, extensive antennae and obviously sufficient fuel capacity for the crossing.

I combined these bits of information considering the, I am told 95,000 miles of navigable shoreline in the U.S.A. and it causes me a lot of concern. A prime example is Port San Luis in mid coast CA. There is a dry dock for small boats at the base of the cliff under the Diablo Canyon nuclear generation station. A relatively small atomic incident might cause great destruction.

Elvin I. Tinkham
Alta Loma, CA

Elvin I. Tinkham on 09/07/2010 at 00:42

Submit Your Reader's Comment Below
*Name
 
*eMail
 
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
*Comments
 
 
Refresh
Please enter the text displayed in the image.
The picture contains 6 characters.
*Characters
  
*Legal Notice

NDIA is not responsible for screening, policing, editing, or monitoring your or another user's postings and encourages all of its users to use reasonable discretion and caution in evaluating or reviewing any posting. Moreover, and except as provided below with respect to NDIA's right and ability to delete or remove a posting (or any part thereof), NDIA does not endorse, oppose, or edit any opinion or information provided by you or another user and does not make any representation with respect to, nor does it endorse the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or reliability of any advice, opinion, statement, or other material displayed, uploaded, or distributed by you or any other user. Nevertheless, NDIA reserves the right to delete or take other action with respect to postings (or parts thereof) that NDIA believes in good faith violate this Legal Notice and/or are potentially harmful or unlawful. If you violate this Legal Notice, NDIA may, in its sole discretion, delete the unacceptable content from your posting, remove or delete the posting in its entirety, issue you a warning, and/or terminate your use of the NDIA site. Moreover, it is a policy of NDIA to take appropriate actions under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and other applicable intellectual property laws. If you become aware of postings that violate these rules regarding acceptable behavior or content, you may contact NDIA at 703.522.1820.

 
 
  Bookmark and Share