Security Beat 

No Need to Rethink ‘No-Fly’ List Criteria, Say Intelligence Chiefs 

2,010 

By Stew Magnuson  

The former director of the Central Intelligence Agency and the Defense Department’s top intelligence chief both called for common sense answers to questions of who is and isn’t added to terrorist watch lists.

Their comments came in response to criticism leveled at the spy community in the aftermath of the Christmas Day bombing plot.

The name of the suspect, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, was reportedly in watch-list databases, but not the “no fly” list which would have prevented him from boarding the Detroit-bound flight.

Former CIA Director Gen. Michael Hayden said he had received a  “fairly decent account” of what happened from former colleagues in the intelligence community. Everything the CIA had in its files was shared with the National Counterterrorism Center, he said at the National Defense Industrial Association biometrics conference.

“One of the side effects of increased sharing is that we have created a tsunami of information rushing at our analysts,” said Hayden, who is now a consultant with the Chertoff Group. The center adds 200 names to its watch lists every day, he added.

James Clapper, undersecretary of defense for intelligence, said analysts are not “clairvoyant mind readers … We’re simply not going to bat .1000 all the time.”

“It’s not so much connecting dots, it’s the number of dots and their obscurity and their opaqueness,” Clapper said, but added that the “dot” cliche should be banned from the English language. “It’s much more abstract and less specific than it appears after the fact,” he said, answering those who have used 20/20 hindsight to make conclusions about the case.

The criteria for placing someone on a “no fly” list are very stringent, Clapper said. They are almost equivalent to what would pass muster in a court of law, he asserted. If names are added because of “wispy intelligence” then the lists will expand. Innocent travelers may have their rights infringed upon, he said.

The Defense Department has contributed 870 names to the list, and 70 of the suspects later attempted to board flights, but were denied, he said.

Hayden said the “broad political pressure” prior to the Christmas Day plot was to make it hard to get on the no fly list. Now, with the “hyperventilating” in the aftermath of the Christmas Day plot, that has come full circle.

“Getting on the no-fly list is a challenge,” Hayden said. Adding names that don’t belong there would be counterproductive.

“You can’t ignore the fact that [Abdulmutallab] boarded the aircraft with a weapon,” he said of the plot. Nevertheless, the incident “actually reflects the success of our endeavors. It was almost a Hail Mary pass on the part of al-Qaida.”

The terrorist group apparently sent a man with little training, and gave him an explosive device that had a low probability of success.

“Despite all those things, we were only one half jump behind him,” he said.“That should be taken as a metric on what our collective efforts have been able to do over the past eight years in terms of closing options to al-Qaida,” Hayden said.
Submit Your Reader's Comment Below
*Name
 
*eMail
 
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
*Comments
 
 
Refresh
Please enter the text displayed in the image.
The picture contains 6 characters.
*Characters
  
*Legal Notice

NDIA is not responsible for screening, policing, editing, or monitoring your or another user's postings and encourages all of its users to use reasonable discretion and caution in evaluating or reviewing any posting. Moreover, and except as provided below with respect to NDIA's right and ability to delete or remove a posting (or any part thereof), NDIA does not endorse, oppose, or edit any opinion or information provided by you or another user and does not make any representation with respect to, nor does it endorse the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or reliability of any advice, opinion, statement, or other material displayed, uploaded, or distributed by you or any other user. Nevertheless, NDIA reserves the right to delete or take other action with respect to postings (or parts thereof) that NDIA believes in good faith violate this Legal Notice and/or are potentially harmful or unlawful. If you violate this Legal Notice, NDIA may, in its sole discretion, delete the unacceptable content from your posting, remove or delete the posting in its entirety, issue you a warning, and/or terminate your use of the NDIA site. Moreover, it is a policy of NDIA to take appropriate actions under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and other applicable intellectual property laws. If you become aware of postings that violate these rules regarding acceptable behavior or content, you may contact NDIA at 703.522.1820.

 
 
  Bookmark and Share