Twitter Facebook Google RSS
 
Security Beat 

Underlying Science Behind Biometrics Requires More Rigor, Report Says 

12  2,010 

By Stew Magnuson 

The biometrics industry has seen rapid growth in the post-9/11 world with numerous companies touting products that they say can confirm a subject’s identity based on his physical or behavioral characteristics with reasonable accuracy.

The physical measurements range from finger and palm prints, to irises, facial and speech recognition and other modes. Behavior can derive from the way a person types to the way he walks.

But none of these methods is infallible, and much of the underlying basic research that can confirm the utility of the devices has not been carried out, said a National Academy of Sciences report, “Biometric Recognition: Challenges and Opportunity.” This is occurring even as the technologies are becoming more ubiquitous, it added.

“Users and developers of biometric systems should recognize and take into account the limitations and constraints of biometric systems — especially the probabilistic nature of the underlying science,” the report said.

Because a person’s physical traits change over time, or can be intentionally altered in ways to fool a machine that reads them, no single method for collecting, analyzing and confirming whether the subject is who he says he is, can be called 100 percent accurate, the report concluded.

Human recognition systems are “inherently fallible,” the report said. Faces, voices, and other modes change over time.

There needs to be more studies on how populations of test subjects interact with biometric systems, particularly if they are connected to programs of “national importance,” the report stated. Presumptions and burdens of proof arising from technologies need to be based on solid, peer-reviewed studies, it added.

Laboratory evaluations of technology are useful, but they often do not reliably predict field performance, the report said.

“As biometric recognition is deployed in systems of national importance, additional research is needed at virtually all levels of the system including sensors, data management, human factors and testing,” the report recommended.

Submit Your Reader's Comment Below
*Name
 
*eMail
 
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
*Comments
 
 
Refresh
Please enter the text displayed in the image.
The picture contains 6 characters.
*Characters
  
*Legal Notice

NDIA is not responsible for screening, policing, editing, or monitoring your or another user's postings and encourages all of its users to use reasonable discretion and caution in evaluating or reviewing any posting. Moreover, and except as provided below with respect to NDIA's right and ability to delete or remove a posting (or any part thereof), NDIA does not endorse, oppose, or edit any opinion or information provided by you or another user and does not make any representation with respect to, nor does it endorse the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or reliability of any advice, opinion, statement, or other material displayed, uploaded, or distributed by you or any other user. Nevertheless, NDIA reserves the right to delete or take other action with respect to postings (or parts thereof) that NDIA believes in good faith violate this Legal Notice and/or are potentially harmful or unlawful. If you violate this Legal Notice, NDIA may, in its sole discretion, delete the unacceptable content from your posting, remove or delete the posting in its entirety, issue you a warning, and/or terminate your use of the NDIA site. Moreover, it is a policy of NDIA to take appropriate actions under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and other applicable intellectual property laws. If you become aware of postings that violate these rules regarding acceptable behavior or content, you may contact NDIA at 703.522.1820.

 
 
  Bookmark and Share