Port Security 

After Six Years, Still No Tamper-Proof Shipping Containers 

2,009 

By Matthew Rusling 

After a six-year search for a tamper-proof shipping container, no product has been fielded and one major vendor has dropped out of the race, citing a lack of progress by the Department of Homeland Security.  

U.S. Customs and Border Protection is tapping industry to provide an off-the-shelf “conveyance security device,” which will be fixed to a container and electronically alert a CBP database if its doors are opened during transit.

The effort is part of the Container Security Initiative, in which CBP works with partner nations to prevent terrorists, drug runners and human traffickers from stashing contraband, bombs — or even people — in U.S.-bound containers.

General Electric Enterprise Solutions, however, recently halted development of its device, citing continued uncertainty over government testing and deployment policy. The company was unable to obtain firm dates for testing or deployment and was not notified of CBP’s policies regarding those issues, said Michelle May, a spokeswoman.

DHS has named shipping — a $100 billion industry that generates more than a million U.S. jobs — part of the nation’s “critical infrastructure.” There are more than 125 container transport firms in the United States, an increase of more than 60 percent during the last decade, according to the World Shipping Council. U.S. ports handle 50,000 containers from 175 countries daily. About 1,500 ocean liners make around 26,000 ports calls in the United States each year.

Chris Koch, president and chief executive officer of the World Shipping Council, said CBP is actively seeking a container security device. “It’s not like CBP has been sitting on their hands,” he said. “It’s a very complex issue.”

Patrick Simmons, director for non-intrusive inspection technology at CBP, said he conducted thousands of tests with several products. CBP will likely buy from more than one firm, but systems must be interoperable. This requires companies to share proprietary technology, which they are reluctant to do.

“The first guy out of the box who comes out with the answer has to share his work,” he said.

Vendors also have yet to develop a communication network secure enough to transmit data from containers, he said.

Testifying before Congress last year, Koch said a number of technical issues remain unresolved. Those include identifying personnel with access to the device, ruggedness and data encryption.

Finding an acceptable level of false positive and false negative rates is another issue, he said.

Simmons said testing has yielded a 1 percent to 10 percent range of false alarms. These can be triggered by anything from jostling on the high seas to a fall from a truck.
Koch told Congress that alarms also sound when customs agents open container doors, which is the norm in some foreign nations. But how to build the technology without disrupting some nations’ security practices remains an issue.

“Virtually all containers from such locations would alarm,” he said.

Shipping containers come in various sizes — some as large as a tractor trailer.

Ken Conception, program manager for cargo conveyance technology at DHS, is overseeing the development of a shipping container that is made from lightweight composite materials. It has embedded sensors in the walls.

A customs officer in a partner nation will punch a code into a handheld device before opening the container’s door. That information will be transferred back to a database in the United States, which will record when, where and by whom a door was opened. If the box senses an unauthorized opening, a database will be alerted.

Building the technology is only the first step, Conception said. The real challenge is moving a container with embedded sensors through the supply chain without disrupting commerce. It could be dropped, struck by lightning, undergo extreme heat or cold or be jostled during storms at sea — all of which could trigger false alarms.  Hammering out those details takes time, he said.

Fred Burton, analyst at Stratfor, said that even the most advanced technology cannot prevent terrorists from bribing their way past corrupt officials.

“If a person can get tons of dope or counterfeit goods into the country, what else could they bring in?” 
Reader Comments

Re: After Six Years, Still No Tamper-Proof Shipping Containers

In reality there will probably never be a "tamper-proof" shipping container. Rather the goal is to make it "tamper-evident/tamper-resistant" with real-time alerting and a lock with a standoff time to allow authorities to respond to the tampering before the box is opened.
Also, the implementation of such devices most likely wont come from DHS unless there is an event in the supply chain. Business will most likely be the implementors of this technology as they see the ROI in such devices due to increased thefts and the desire to cut insurence costs. There is a technology being developed that brings both aspects of physical security and real-time alerting. The GeoLok, developed by the TrakLok Corporation ( www.traklok.net )provides better security than any other container security solution because it is not only a tracking/tamper-alerting device but it is also a armored lock with a 30 minute stand off time. For more info visit www.traklok.net

Torry Shealy on 09/10/2009 at 12:56

Submit Your Reader's Comment Below
*Name
 
*eMail
 
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
*Comments
 
 
Refresh
Please enter the text displayed in the image.
The picture contains 6 characters.
*Characters
  
*Legal Notice

NDIA is not responsible for screening, policing, editing, or monitoring your or another user's postings and encourages all of its users to use reasonable discretion and caution in evaluating or reviewing any posting. Moreover, and except as provided below with respect to NDIA's right and ability to delete or remove a posting (or any part thereof), NDIA does not endorse, oppose, or edit any opinion or information provided by you or another user and does not make any representation with respect to, nor does it endorse the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or reliability of any advice, opinion, statement, or other material displayed, uploaded, or distributed by you or any other user. Nevertheless, NDIA reserves the right to delete or take other action with respect to postings (or parts thereof) that NDIA believes in good faith violate this Legal Notice and/or are potentially harmful or unlawful. If you violate this Legal Notice, NDIA may, in its sole discretion, delete the unacceptable content from your posting, remove or delete the posting in its entirety, issue you a warning, and/or terminate your use of the NDIA site. Moreover, it is a policy of NDIA to take appropriate actions under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and other applicable intellectual property laws. If you become aware of postings that violate these rules regarding acceptable behavior or content, you may contact NDIA at 703.522.1820.