Security Beat 

9/11 Commission Recommendations Are Tough Sells 

2,008 

Reported by Stew Magnuson 

Istock PhotoThe implementation of two of the 9/11 Commission’s recommendations on strengthening the verification of individuals’ identities are getting pushed back.

Slipped in among the massive omnibus spending bill Congress passed at the end of 2007 was an amendment delaying the controversial Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative rule that requires passports or other identification for those traveling between Canada and Mexico.

Previously, those traveling to those nations were going to be required to show a passport, or some other officially recognized identification, proving citizenship beginning Jan. 31. That has now been pushed back to June 1, 2008.

Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, and ranking member of the Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee, was among the lawmakers who pushed for the delay.

“It is important that we strike a balance between the security of our nation’s borders and the free flow of commerce and travel to and from the United States,” she said in a statement.

The controversial requirement caused consternation, especially on the northern border, where citizens were accustomed to giving a verbal declaration of citizenship. The policy created a backlog of passport applications at the State Department. The initiative earlier implemented rules requiring passports for those arriving by air.

But land crossings are different, Collins pointed out. “For many Maine residents, quick and easy border crossing is critical in order to access essential services, to travel to their jobs, to attend church, and to visit family and friends.”

She wants the Department of Homeland Security to come up with “alternative, less expensive” forms of identification that take into account the needs of frequent border crossers before the new deadline.

Among the possibilities are enhanced driver’s licenses that are currently being developed by several border states. Such licenses will have machine-readable chips or bar codes that contain biometric and other data that can be quickly read by Customs and Border Protection agents. Arizona, California, Michigan, Texas, Vermont and Washington are among the states to produce such cards, a DHS statement said.

REAL-ID, an even more controversial law that requires states to provide driver’s licenses that can be machine readable across all 50 states, will be delayed five more years. The law, passed in 2005, initially required compliance by May this year. That proved not only to be a technical challenge, but faced widespread opposition from civil libertarians — on the right and left — and more importantly, state governments, which called it an expensive, unfunded mandate.

DHS Secretary Michael Chertoff, citing the concerns of states, pushed compliance back to 2013.


Submit Your Reader's Comment Below
*Name
 
*eMail
 
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
*Comments
 
 
Refresh
Please enter the text displayed in the image.
The picture contains 6 characters.
*Characters
  
*Legal Notice

NDIA is not responsible for screening, policing, editing, or monitoring your or another user's postings and encourages all of its users to use reasonable discretion and caution in evaluating or reviewing any posting. Moreover, and except as provided below with respect to NDIA's right and ability to delete or remove a posting (or any part thereof), NDIA does not endorse, oppose, or edit any opinion or information provided by you or another user and does not make any representation with respect to, nor does it endorse the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or reliability of any advice, opinion, statement, or other material displayed, uploaded, or distributed by you or any other user. Nevertheless, NDIA reserves the right to delete or take other action with respect to postings (or parts thereof) that NDIA believes in good faith violate this Legal Notice and/or are potentially harmful or unlawful. If you violate this Legal Notice, NDIA may, in its sole discretion, delete the unacceptable content from your posting, remove or delete the posting in its entirety, issue you a warning, and/or terminate your use of the NDIA site. Moreover, it is a policy of NDIA to take appropriate actions under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and other applicable intellectual property laws. If you become aware of postings that violate these rules regarding acceptable behavior or content, you may contact NDIA at 703.522.1820.

 
 
  Bookmark and Share