Twitter Facebook Google RSS
 
ARTICLE 

Survivability Not Just About Heavy Armor, Says Cebrowski 

2,003 

by Roxana Tiron 

The Pentagon’s transformation chief, retired Vice Adm. Arthur Cebrowski, endorsed the U.S. Army’s Future Combat System for its emphasis on information-based warfare and speed. The FCS, he said, will help prove that heavy armor is no longer the dominant factor in a ground war.

Recent battles in Iraq, Cebrowski said, proved that speed and integrated information networks were key to defeating the enemy.

“I look at these marvelous Navy and Air Force munitions and what they do to armor. I look at what one of our own tank rounds does to everyone else’s armor in the world,” he said at a breakfast with defense reporters. “I go, well, you know the notion that steel protects you, just doesn’t seem to be there, because it doesn’t protect in the absolute. Nothing protects in the absolute. What you, therefore, want is a mix of things.

“Do I want to take all tanks out of the force? No. Do I want to take tanks as we know them out of the force? Probably yes,” he noted. “If I can have a 35-ton tank [...], a lighter tank with the same protection and lethality, I’d much rather have the lighter one, because I can move it faster. ... That is one of the reasons why I like the Army’s transformation program in the FCS.”

Armor is not the only answer to the survivability problem, he added. “Just as in some cases, it is really nice to have armor, in a lot of cases it doesn’t help you. It didn’t help 17 dead sailors on board the [USS] Cole, for example. That is a steel ship. And so you don’t see Navy talking about adding more steel to its destroyers. Instead it reaches for other things to create the protective environment.”

  Bookmark and Share