Twitter Facebook Google RSS
 
ARTICLE 

U.S. Air Force Touts Success of African Flood Relief Effort 

12  2,000 

by Stephen Willingham 

During the 1990s, the U.S. Air Force flew 250 humanitarian missions to more than 40 countries, said Air Force Lt. Gen. Joseph H. Wehrle Jr., deputy chief of staff for plans and programs. These efforts provided more than 339 million pounds of relief supplies, he recently told reporters on Capitol Hill.

Before coming to Washington, Wehrle served as commander of the Third Air Force, based in Mildenhall, England, from where he headed a relief effort that followed massive flooding in Mozambique, Africa.

After deploying to southern Africa, Wehrle supervised Joint Task Force Atlas Response, which carried more than 2 million pounds of relief supplies to the flood-ravaged southeastern African nation. Back-to back typhoons slammed into southeastern Africa, within 17 days of one another, causing the floods.

Wehrle noted that the relief campaign received “limited” media exposure in the United States, where most television networks were focused on the story of young Cuban castaway Elian Gonzales.

The month long relief campaign—between February and March this year— involved about 800 U.S. military personnel, said Wehrle.

Relief agencies and regional governments estimated that at least 2 million people were affected in Mozambique. Also, South Africa, Botswanna, and Zimbabwe all requested aid to help them recover from the devastating storms.

“The target was Mozambique and the enemy was Mother Nature,” said Wehrle. “The joint operational area was nearly the size of the eastern United States, with all land west to eastern Texas and north to Michigan thrown in.

“Relief supplies were flown in [to South Africa] mainly by C-5s,” Wehrle explained. “But they needed decent airfields where they could unload and supplies then could be transferred to C-130s for delivery to Mozambique.”

The C-5s also brought in helicopters, HH-60s and MH-53s that were required to transport supplies into Mozambique’s interior.

To avoid the appearance that the U.S. and European forces were taking over the situation, South Africa, which provided the primary relief role, was sent in first, Wehrle said. “Cooperation with other countries in the region proved to be the key to success. The United States was not the hero in this situation.”

“We had to avoid looking like we didn’t need anybody else,” Wehrle continued.

Initially, he said, the operation worked out of Waterkloof, Pretoria, and Durban, South Africa. However, the runways at Waterkloof soon developed enough potholes to force the relief effort to move to Hoedspruit, a former South African military base that was closer to Mozambique.

Because of flooding and residual muck, once the waters began to recede, there was no place for C-130s to land except in Maputo, the capital of Mozambique and a more remote coastal city named Beira, Wehrle said.

From these terminals, supplies were transferred to helicopters and then transported to isolated areas. Due to ever increasing helicopter traffic and to relieve congestion at the pumps, helicopters were refueled in the air.

To locate stranded people and breaks in roads, bridges and railway lines, cameras were mounted on the bellies of the C-130s, Wehrle said. This search and rescue technique is code-named “Keen Sage,” he said. “The unique thing about this operation is there was no formal organization or turf war over who was in charge or who worked for whom,” said Wehrle.

Once in Maputo, Wehrle established his forward headquarters in two hotel rooms that eventually accommodated a 22-person staff. This location left the Third Air Force commander 100 miles away from the rest of his staff. Cell phones provided the primary means of communication.

“There was no room for big dishes or VTCs (video television conferencing) screens in our cramped quarters in the Maputo hotel,” Wehrle explained.

When it came to actually distributing supplies throughout the countryside, the NGOs executed that part of the campaign. Having uniformed military personnel performing this task would have been “controversial,” he said.

“The people trusted the international relief organizations and the NGOs and didn’t really want troops delivering the supplies,” Wehrle said.

The mission lasted 28 days and cost about $1 million per day, Wehrle said. A supplemental appropriation to the fiscal year 2000 military budget covered the cost. Other countries involved in the relief effort, besides South Africa and Great Britain, were France, Germany, Spain, Portugal and Malawi.

  Bookmark and Share