Twitter Facebook Google RSS
 
Security Beat 

B-52 Used to Monitor Suspicious Ships Approaching the U.S. 

2,009 

By Stew Magnuson 

U.S. Strategic Command has found new homeland security missions for the Cold War era B-52H Stratofortress.

The bombers, many of which are now nearly 50 years old, have flown a “number of missions” to snap pictures of suspicious ships approaching U.S. waters, said Lt. Gen. Robert J. Elder Jr., who leads the 8th Air Force at Barksdale Air Base, La., and the global strike joint functional component at U.S. Strategic Command.

“The Navy gives us a ship to locate based on a signature and we’ve gone out about 1,000 nautical miles from the coast … to take a picture and ship it back,” he told reporters in Washington.

Identifying U.S.-bound ships farther out to sea has been a long-time goal of the Department of Homeland Security and the Coast Guard.

The B-52 also saw action in the aftermath of Hurricane Ike last year when Predator unmanned aerial vehicles were grounded due to bad weather. A B-52 surveyed the damage in about four hours, he said.

“Right now we’re moving toward where every platform is a sensor,” Elder said. For example, every jet fighter carrying an electro-optical pod can take a picture and transmit it back to a command center.

This comes as the Coast Guard has been working toward a system that can track vessels from near shore to distances of 2,000 nautical miles out to sea.

Its efforts have faced some delays, and there is a chance that the multiple systems being employed will duplicate each other’s data and create waste, a Government Accountability Office report found.

“While a certain amount of redundancy can be beneficial if it occurs by design, our previous work has found that unintended duplication indicates the potential for inefficiency and waste,” the unclassified version of the report said.

There are four main systems being used or in the works. The automated identification system requires that vessels entering U.S. coastal waters within 50 nautical miles transmit data such as identification, speed and course. Long-range AIS, which will not be available until about 2014, is designed to work at distances of 2,000 nautical miles.

The international long-range identification and tracking system (LRIT) will rely on existing onboard radio equipment currently used to transmit identity and locations to rescue forces in case of emergency. Some countries, but not all, are ready to participate in this system.

GAO was most concerned about long-range AIS and LRIT being duplicative.

Another way to identify and track ships is what GAO calls “national technical means” — a government euphemism for spy satellites or other secret sensors.

There are many holes in this multi-layered approach, GAO pointed out. First, AIS and the other transponder-based systems depend upon the good will of the ship’s captain. If it isn’t turned on, there will be no way to identify the vessel. And only ships of 300 gross tonnage or more are required to carry such systems. There is no requirement for small vessels.

A top secret sensor platform could track a small vessel, or one with its AIS switched off, approaching U.S. shores, but “the classified tracking information cannot be passed to staff of other agencies without proper clearance.”

The Department of Homeland Security in response to the report said long-range AIS and LRIT are two complementary systems with different sets of data being drawn from different classes of vessels. They are being developed under separate international agreements and statutes, it added.

GAO countered that other widely available data, such as routine ship filings, combined with one of the two systems would make it wasteful, and that the vessels sizes were similar. Also, the Coast Guard was not required under any law to use long-range AIS.
Reader Comments

Re: B-52 Used to Monitor Suspicious Ships Approaching the U.S.

I worked on the 1st H models as a bomb/nav radar tech in '61. We took the 30 hour set up program for the terrain avoidance radar and cut it down to 3 hours. I'm proud of that. Oh yea, what a change in the attitudes of the flight crews at debriefing. They were flying blind at 500 ft. alt. and I was the guy setting their terrain avoidance clearance. Now they loved my A1C butt.

Thomas on 10/07/2009 at 16:37

Re: B-52 Used to Monitor Suspicious Ships Approaching the U.S.

As a retired B-52 Radar Navigator I was asked to participate in an experiment to determine if B-52's and KC-135's could be used to detect shipping using their radar systems from the 32,000 ft elevation. This was done with the Vietnam War in mind in 1966. Doing such with the B-52G was simple. The KC-135 had no way of taking picture of the radar screen so I devised a camera mounting system that bolted to the screen to allow a time exposure encompasing one full radar sweep. I was a Captain at the time and was "needed" on base so the Lt. Col. went to the conference at 15th AF HQ, March AFB, CA. I never heard of the outcome.

Abe Low, Lt.Col, USAF ret. on 09/30/2009 at 18:36

Re: B-52 Used to Monitor Suspicious Ships Approaching the U.S.

I would point out to the writers of this report that when it comes to intelligence collection, there is no such thing as "inefficiency and waste" due to redundancy. Yes, during peacetime, it may feel like we have too many assets capable of doing the same thing. But the military is designed for combat, not peacetime, and one lesson of combat these folks seem not to have learned is that assets always get chewed up quicker than anyone anticipates. In areas such as intelligence collection, maximum redundancy is vital so that gaps do not occur as a situation progresses.

Bruce Reynolds on 05/18/2009 at 09:50

Submit Your Reader's Comment Below
*Name
 
*eMail
 
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
*Comments
 
 
Refresh
Please enter the text displayed in the image.
The picture contains 6 characters.
*Characters
  
*Legal Notice

NDIA is not responsible for screening, policing, editing, or monitoring your or another user's postings and encourages all of its users to use reasonable discretion and caution in evaluating or reviewing any posting. Moreover, and except as provided below with respect to NDIA's right and ability to delete or remove a posting (or any part thereof), NDIA does not endorse, oppose, or edit any opinion or information provided by you or another user and does not make any representation with respect to, nor does it endorse the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or reliability of any advice, opinion, statement, or other material displayed, uploaded, or distributed by you or any other user. Nevertheless, NDIA reserves the right to delete or take other action with respect to postings (or parts thereof) that NDIA believes in good faith violate this Legal Notice and/or are potentially harmful or unlawful. If you violate this Legal Notice, NDIA may, in its sole discretion, delete the unacceptable content from your posting, remove or delete the posting in its entirety, issue you a warning, and/or terminate your use of the NDIA site. Moreover, it is a policy of NDIA to take appropriate actions under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and other applicable intellectual property laws. If you become aware of postings that violate these rules regarding acceptable behavior or content, you may contact NDIA at 703.522.1820.

 
 
  Bookmark and Share