Twitter Facebook Google RSS
 
Inside Science and Technology 

Rucksack Generates Electricity, Lightens Troops’ Loads 

10  2,008 

Grace V. Jean 

Anyone who has tried running while wearing a backpack knows how cumbersome a small load can become even after a short distance.

On the battlefield, troops carry as much as 80 pounds of battle gear and they lug an additional 20 to 30 pounds of batteries to power their portable electronic devices. That weight is so problematic that “lightening the load” has become the ground forces’ mantra. But efforts to reduce weight have been stymied in part because troops need sufficient power for their equipment — energy that only comes from heavy batteries.

Finding a way around that conundrum has been a technological challenge. But researchers at the University of Pennsylvania have developed a rucksack that may soon allow troops to not only charge up their radios, night vision goggles and GPS units on the move, but also ease the weight problem.

Based upon a standard rigid-frame pack carried by hikers, the electricity-generating backpack produces power from the mechanical energy created by a person walking or running. 

If troops are carrying 80 pounds of equipment on their backs, the energy that goes into lifting that heavy load is 40 watts of mechanical energy, says Larry Rome, a professor of biology at the university who developed the technology with a grant from the Office of Naval Research.

“If we can capture a small amount of movement as they step and walk and lift the load, then we should be able to generate much more electricity than we ever have before,” he says.

When a person walks, the body bounces up and down about two to three inches. A backpack, including the contents, also moves the same distance. 

For the electricity-generating backpack, university researchers have separated the cargo compartment from the backpack’s frame. Using springs, the compartment is suspended from the frame, which allows the load to move up and down at a slightly different pace. The load’s movement turns gears located on the frame, which connect to a generator that produces the electricity.

“The more load you carry and the faster you move, the more electricity you can generate,” says Rome.

The latest version of the backpack can generate 20 watts of electricity. Most of the portable electronics used by the military operate on less than half a watt of electricity.

“Our device will power equipment in real time,” says Rome, who founded the company Lightning Packs LLC, to continue with the development. Any excess energy can be collected and stored in capacitors or a battery for later use.

The researchers are still developing the interface for connecting the backpack to the various electronic devices. Options under consideration include charging the gadgets directly from the backpack using cables or creating standardized batteries for the various electronics.

“We anticipate that there will be one large rechargeable battery, and the electricity would be distributed from there,” says Rome.

Under a different contract from ONR, the scientist has created another similar unit, called the ergonomic backpack, which doesn’t produce electricity but reduces discomfort.

For example, if you have a 50-pound load in your backpack, it exerts 50 pounds of force on you while standing still, Rome says. When you run, the peak force increases to as much as 150 pounds.
 
By being suspended on bungee cords, the ergonomic backpack remains at a constant height above the ground. That reduces the accelerative forces on the wearer by 82 percent during walking and by 86 percent during running.

For the same amount of metabolic effort it takes to carry 48 pounds in a regular backpack, a person can carry 60 pounds in the ergonomic backpack, he says. 

The electricity-generating backpack also contains some inherent ergonomic benefits. The pack’s spring-suspension system reduces the accelerative force by about 30 percent, Rome says.

In the future, the two concepts could be merged into a single backpack. If troops want more ergonomics and less electric generating power, the scientists are confident they’ll be able to tweak the technology to cater to their exact specifications.

“Not only do we feel that this will improve performance in the field, but it will also reduce acute injuries and long-term injuries after they have retired,” says Rome.

The backpacks also have appeal to first responders and humanitarian assistance workers who may be operating in locations where electricity access may be problematic, he adds.

The Office of Naval Research will test the backpacks in the coming year.
Reader Comments

Re: Rucksack Generates Electricity, Lightens Troops’ Loads

Interesting article.

Brandon on 01/16/2009 at 16:09

Re: Rucksack Generates Electricity, Lightens Troops’ Loads

As a retired combat infantry man I think its a great idea, anything to lighten the load would help greatly,any average citizen should try carrying 100 pounds around all day to get the idea,I served for 28 years and retired an e-9 3rd 75th rangers out of Ft. Benning.God Bless our troops. "RLTW"

CSM Mark Vest on 10/27/2008 at 17:04

Re: Rucksack Generates Electricity, Lightens Troops’ Loads

Interesting article. However, I would like to point out that the load metric stated in this article (“20 to 30 pounds of batteries to power their portable electronic devices”) is severely flawed.

There has been only one in-theater load study ever, done in Afghanistan. Soldiers in that study carried fewer than 2 pounds of batteries. The RTO required more obviously, but those batteries were always cross loaded, so that no one individual ever carried more than 10 lbs of batteries, with the average being 2 lbs or under.

Landwarrior, THEORETICALLY, would require something like 20 lbs of batteries over a 72 hour mission without resupply. Landwarrior has never done this type of mission, and thus no Landwarrior soldier in combat has ever carried 20 lbs in batteries.

Jane’s Defense published a report in 2005 where they calculated that the average soldier could be carrying 20-30 lbs of batteries over an unsupported 5 day mission. Jane’s Defense also used a weight of 0.3lbs for a single AA battery. Correcting for their severe math error, the average drops to around 5 pounds for an unsupported 5 day mission, a mission type that does not occur anyway (with apologies to LRSD, Scouts, and SF SR teams of course).

The US Army’s Infantry School has published a briefing which discusses battery load for an entire Platoon by calculating the maximum theoretical number of batteries that could be used over a 72 hour mission. Using these listed Platoon numbers, one calculates a load of roughly 10 lbs/Soldier. However, if one digs into the full brief, you realize that the Infantry School mistakenly listed a Company as a Platoon in their brief, and using their own backup numbers, their theoretical maximum weight per soldier drops down to a bit under 4 pounds per soldier.

DARPA has repeated stated that the Future Force will require the equivalent of 20-30 pounds of battery per Warfighter. DARPA’s Future Force situation does not actually exist right now.

Again, your article is interesting, but once you understand what the actual load of batteries carried actually is, the value of adding a couple of pounds to a backpack to generate the power to reduce a couple of pounds of batteries makes little operational sense.

Ken Zemach on 09/18/2008 at 15:12

Submit Your Reader's Comment Below
*Name
 
*eMail
 
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
*Comments
 
 
Refresh
Please enter the text displayed in the image.
The picture contains 6 characters.
*Characters
  
*Legal Notice

NDIA is not responsible for screening, policing, editing, or monitoring your or another user's postings and encourages all of its users to use reasonable discretion and caution in evaluating or reviewing any posting. Moreover, and except as provided below with respect to NDIA's right and ability to delete or remove a posting (or any part thereof), NDIA does not endorse, oppose, or edit any opinion or information provided by you or another user and does not make any representation with respect to, nor does it endorse the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or reliability of any advice, opinion, statement, or other material displayed, uploaded, or distributed by you or any other user. Nevertheless, NDIA reserves the right to delete or take other action with respect to postings (or parts thereof) that NDIA believes in good faith violate this Legal Notice and/or are potentially harmful or unlawful. If you violate this Legal Notice, NDIA may, in its sole discretion, delete the unacceptable content from your posting, remove or delete the posting in its entirety, issue you a warning, and/or terminate your use of the NDIA site. Moreover, it is a policy of NDIA to take appropriate actions under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and other applicable intellectual property laws. If you become aware of postings that violate these rules regarding acceptable behavior or content, you may contact NDIA at 703.522.1820.

 
 
  Bookmark and Share

 Also from Inside Science & Technology