Twitter Facebook Google RSS
 
ARTICLE 

Navy’s Task Force Excel Revamping Sailors’ Training 

11  2,002 

by Harold Kennedy 

The Navy has embarked upon an ambitious program to change the way it trains its sailors. Named Task Force Excel (Excellence through Commitment to Education and Learning), this initiative is intended to make Navy training more adaptable to new technologies and war-fighting tactics.

“You won’t recognize the Navy when we’re done with this process,” the task force’s director, Rear Adm. J. Kevin Moran, told National Defense. Moran—a naval aviator whose previous assignment was commander of Amphibious Group Two in Little Creek, Va.—took over Task Force Excel in August.

The task force, headquartered in Norfolk, was launched a year earlier, after completion of an executive review of naval training. The review, entitled “Revolution in Training,” declared that major improvements were needed to keep up with technological advances, retain experienced personnel and attract talented recruits. The review, headed by retired Vice Adm. Lee Gunn, found that:

The Navy’s current training system, the review concluded, is not set up to produce and maintain the trained force of sailors that the service needs.

Navy training has changed enormously since the service’s early days, when enlisted sailors were taught little more than how to rig sails, tie knots, chip paint, fire cannon and polish brass. Today’s training is far more sophisticated, but it relies too much on 30-year-old methods “rooted in the Cold War-era, when crews, their ships and squadrons had fewer missions, and conscription ensured a constant supply of manpower,” the document said.

All too often, said the review, sailors still are sent to traditional classrooms and taught basically how to operate and maintain specific types of equipment—such as aircraft engines, computers, radios and radar—rather than prepared to find their way through a lifelong career, both inside and outside of the Navy.

Exceptions to this general rule do exist, the review said. Among the examples cited as offering “effective, responsive and flexible training” were the training programs for combat aircrews, Aegis combat system operators, submariners and nuclear-power technicians.

For the most part, however, “the formal, schoolhouse setting dominates Navy training today,” the review said. If the demand for seats in those classrooms meets the forecast through 2007, however, there will be between 7,634 and 9,366 more students than the Navy has funded.

Many of these students could be trained by taking advantage of modern learning techniques and technologies—such as Internet and simulation-based programs—that reduce the need to send sailors to residency courses, the study found. Installation of Internet-capable computers and simulators on ships makes its possible for sailors to train even while at sea.

Reducing the need for sailors to attend classrooms, while improving the quality of training would help the Navy—which is plagued by an increasing shortage of qualified personnel—in a number of ways, the review noted.

During the past decade, the Navy has shrunk from 595,000 to 375,000 active-duty sailors. Meanwhile, training needs have increased. E-5 sailors assigned to an Arleigh Burke DDG-51-class destroyer, for example, require an average of 39 percent more technical training than those aboard an older Spruance-class DD-963 vessel.

At the same time, more Americans are continuing their education after they complete high school. When the all-volunteer force began in the mid-1970s, 50 percent of high-school students went directly to college, the report said. Today, nearly two thirds do so.

To put it another way, between 1974 and 1999, the number of non-college-bound high-school graduates—the Navy’s traditional enlisted recruiting market—decreased by almost 40 percent.

“The gap between what high-quality sailors and potential sailors want and expect in their personal and professional learning and what the Navy is prepared to deliver is too great to make the Navy an employer of choice today,” the review said.

To close this gap, Navy training systems must do a better job of improving the performance and enriching the personal growth and development of the individual sailor, the document said.

Better-Educated Youth
The report helped convince Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Vern Clark to declare improved Navy training as his top priority for the year. “We must have a commitment to education and training that will arm our sailors to excel,” said Clark in a message to Navy leaders. “We owe those who promise to serve the best possible training throughout their Navy experience so they can succeed and prosper in their professional and personal lives.”

To strengthen the training process, the Navy is establishing “learning centers” at major bases around the country. These centers will take over responsibility for all training programs currently operated by the Naval Educational and Training Command, as well as some run by other units, Moran said. The first six centers were stood up in September. They included the centers for naval engineering, in Norfolk; service support, in Athens, Ga.; intelligence in Dam Neck, Va.; naval leadership, in Little Creek; cryptology, in Pensacola, Fla., and aviation technical training, also in Pensacola.

The Navy is considering establishing similar facilities focusing on construction, surface combat operations, personal development, nuclear engineering, submarine operations and information technology. Their locations, as yet, have not been determined, Moran said.

To support the centers, a Naval Personnel Development Command has been stood up at Norfolk. It will be headed by Moran, who also will retain his job as director of Task Force Excel.

The NPDC will include training-support commands at each of the centers, which will provide centralized management for students and facilities.

In addition, a human-performance center is being set up at the Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division, in Orlando, Fla., to recommend new tools to improve the war-fighting performance of sailors, their units and the entire fleet. At this center, a highly trained group of psychologists is evaluating job-performance aids, e-learning, structured on-the-job training, electronic performance-support systems and adjustments in combat systems and personnel selection.

Detailed Career Path
The learning centers’ function will be to develop and maintain a detailed training plan—called “the sailor continuum”—that will define the knowledge, skills and abilities that service members must master to achieve specific goals throughout their careers.

The continuum includes five “vectors,” or areas, Moran explained. They include professional development, or occupational training; personal development in life skills, such as financial planning, health and safety, and college-level studies; professional military education and leadership training; industry certifications and qualifications related to Navy jobs, and performance assessment.

A continuum will be created for each occupational field, allowing sailors to see exactly what skills and abilities they must possess, and also the corresponding training that is available at any point in their career, Moran said.

The continuum concept also provides sailors a greater opportunity to earn college degrees, both undergraduate and graduate, Moran said. “There’s no reason why any sailor won’t be able to earn at least a bachelor’s degree during a 20-year career,” he said.

The task force, in addition, is working to realign Navy training so that sailors who successfully complete service-related courses can receive certificates from established civilian programs.

By employing the same standards used by industry, the Navy is attempting to make sailors more competitive with their counterparts in private industry, Moran said. “We’re trying to offer training that would be recognized in the civilian sector,” he said.

The task force envisions a 30-year career path for every sailor that takes a raw recruit through boot camp, apprenticeship, journeyman, and master’s levels and even into retirement. Under this plan, a retiree would stay current and involved in Navy life, remaining a source of experience and mentoring. Retirees would continue to have access to Navy educational opportunity as a tangible benefit of service.

To test these concepts, the task force is conducting a number of pilot programs. For example, it is working with the Culinary Institute of America, in Hyde Park, N.Y., to develop a new training program for its mess-management specialists, or cooks.

Graduates of an introductory course can qualify for a certificate from the American Culinary Federation. They can go on to earn associate’s, bachelor’s or master’s degrees in culinary arts. They can even become certified master chefs.

Mess Management Specialist 2nd Class Kenneth Mayberry—assigned to the USS Anzio, a guided-missile cruiser based in Norfolk—took the introductory course earlier this year. The course included “a lot of hands-on training with foods, spices and seasonings,” he said.

“It heightened my skills tenfold,” the 10-year Navy veteran said. “I’d like to go back. I only got a piece of it. I’d like to get my hands on the whole cake.”

NBC’s “Today” show featured a segment on the mess-management program. Mayberry and other sailors conducted a live cooking demonstration with “Today” host Katie Couric. “We stole the show,” Mayberry said.

Back aboard his ship, “I’ve been getting nothing but compliments on my [food] presentation, Mayberry said. “People tell me that they really look forward to eating now.”

Task Force Excel also is partnering with Cisco Systems, of San Jose, Calif., to develop a similar career path for Navy technicians in the fields of information systems, electronics and fire control. Sailors who complete a Cisco Network Academy Program, can qualify as a Cisco Certified Network Associate and earn 12 hours of college credit.

The course, offered at Tidewater Community College in Norfolk, consists of a Web-based curriculum provided by Cisco and classroom laboratory assignments.

“It’s excellent training,” said Electronics Technician 1st Class Mike Womack, another crewmember from the Anzio. “I’ve had quite a bit of experience in networking, and this training was a lot more in depth than anything that I’ve ever seen.”

Womack said that getting a chance to improve his professional credentials is important to him. He has been in the Navy for more than 15 years and plans to retire in another four years or so. He viewed the Cisco training as something that he can take with him into civilian life. “I’ve got a start on an information-technology degree,” he said.

To help sailors manage their careers via the Internet, the Navy has developed a new Web site, dubbed Navy Knowledge Online. It is intended to give sailors instant access to all training and educational information related to their chosen occupational fields, Moran said.

In addition, he said, each sailor will be issued an individual Web page in boot camp. It can be customized and will remain accessible to each, throughout his or her career.

The Web page will enable “sailors to access what is most important to them—the information required to excel, both professionally and personally—no matter where they are stationed or deployed,” Moran said.

Some old salts in the Navy, however, are skeptical that Task Force Excel and its “training revolution” will make much difference over the long run. Even the review acknowledges that the Navy has reorganized its training five times since 1971, and none of those reorganizations has changed things very much.

But this time will be different, said a task force spokesman, Lt. Cmdr. Gary Kirchner. For one thing, he said, the changes have the backing of the chief of naval operations, and Clark has made it known that he wants the new system in place within the next year and a half. In March, Clark told the task force’s board of advisors that he was “willing to commit any resource at my disposal, and within my authority, to ensure the success of this project.”

Another factor is the favorable reaction of the sailors who take the new courses, Moran said. “I can see their eyes light up,” he said. “They can see the potential. All we have to do is refine the process, give them the tools and let them go.”

  Bookmark and Share