FEATURE ARTICLE  

Pollution-Prevention Branch Helps Navy Deal With Waste 

2,001 

by A. Duffy Baker 

The U.S. Navy is investing in a combination of new and old-age technologies to make ships compliant with international treaties that ban waste dumping at sea.

The agency in charge of fielding and testing these technologies is the Pollution Prevention and Material Safety Branch at the Carderock Division Naval Surface Warfare Center, located in Bethesda, Md.

“[We do] research and development for pollution-control technology that will enable ships and submarines to operate in the 21st century and be environmentally sound. We provide them with the technologies and procedures to comply with current legislation,” said Gary Alexander, technical area manager for the solid waste program.

There are three main areas of research: solid waste, liquid waste and hazardous materials.

Currently, there are four pieces of equipment in use aboard ships that were developed by the solid waste program at Carderock, explained Alexander. To dispose of paper, food and cardboard, they have large and small pulpers. In the pulpers, the waste is chopped up and mixed with water to form a slurry that is then dumped into the wake of the ship, as long as it is three nautical miles from any shoreline. It is biodegradable and “basically fish food,” said Alexander. The large pulper can handle 1,000 pounds of waste an hour and the small one, 200 pounds.

Plastic waste is shredded and fed into a processor which melts and compresses it into hard, solid “pizzas” that are approximately 20 inches in diameter and one to two inches thick. The discs can then be stored aboard for later transfer to a landfill. The processor has led to a 30-to-1 reduction in onboard waste volume. It presently is aboard 200 ships. Alexander stated that research has been done into recycling the plastic for use as core material in pier pilings, but thus far that has not proved cost efficient.

The fourth piece of equipment is a shredder for metal and glass. Once broken down, the metal and glass will sink instead of bobbing on the surface when discarded.

Solid waste disposal on submarines is a bit different, explained Tim Bond, one of the developers for submarine plastic waste management. Currently, crews use hydraulic compactors to get rid of solid waste. Pre-made cans are assembled, the waste is compacted into them, they are weighted to sink and then discharged through a hull-penetration valve.

However, amendments to the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships forbid the discharge of plastic waste after 2008. As a result, changes will be needed to allow onboard storage of waste. “We use the same cans that are used for normal trash compaction, but we line it with the odor-barrier bags. We compact the plastic into the odor-barrier bags, then put it in a second bag, and heat seal it. Then, [it is stored] in a locker onboard” for later disposal, said Bond.

Food waste is ground, placed in plastic mesh “wet bags,” weighted for negative buoyancy and discharged with the cans. Bond stated that they are replacing the plastic mesh bags with cloth ones to comply with the no-plastic discharge policy. These changes have led to a 20-to-1 reduction in waste volume.

The technology emphasized in solid-waste disposal is the plasma arc waste-destruction system. Plasma is created when an electric arc is formed in a gas. This technology is more than 100 years old. The systems are large, use heavy refractories and require a skilled workforce. But the system developed by the Navy has done away with that.

John Cofold, a plasma arc expert at Carderock, explained, “One of the reasons plasma arc turned out to be one of best ways to go is it will allow an intimate mixing between the waste and the fuel. Doing so means [that] you can get combustion to take place very quickly in a small space.” Waste is either pulped or shredded by the conventional machines onboard. Then, a hopper delivers it to a hammer mill that reduces the size of the particles for high-temperature thermal destruction.

The particles are blown into the eductor, which causes it to react very rapidly with the plasma plume, turning the particles of waste into syngas, which is made up of carbon monoxide and hydrogen. The gases then are burned in the secondary combustion chamber. “The beauty of this system is that it is a cold-wall system. There are no refractories, unlike a tradition incinerator. Because there are no refractories and you have this intimidate mixing between the plasma plume and the fuel, there is only a small amount of material in there at any one time, about 35 grams a second,” he said. “What this means is that it is a true on/off system. In traditional incineration, there is a warm-up time and a cool-down time, and when you put the waste in, it actually smolders first before igniting. In this system by the time it is completely through the eductor, it is gasified. Because it is gas, it doesn’t require much space to burn, and so the system can be made small.”

Another benefit, cited by Cofold, is the fact that the system is modular, making it possible to reconfigure it based on shipboard needs.

The research program ends this fiscal year. It will be followed up with land-based, engineering-design models, a ship model and then it will be demonstrated and evaluated in time to be aboard the Navy’s new aircraft carrier, the CVN-77.

Pyrogenesis Inc., a Canadian company based in Montreal, has a cooperative research and development agreement with the government and is attempting to put plasma arc waste disposal systems aboard cruise ships. Officials believe this system will have appeal, because the current systems are the size of two decks, explained Cofold. The commercial industry has to comply with the Marine Pollution treaty before the military does. Plus, said Cofold, “They are very eager to get this into the cruise line industry, because that would be very beneficial to us. It would shorten the amount of time and study you would need to put it aboard a carrier.”

Liquid waste also is a problem aboard Navy vessels. There are two kinds of liquid waste, non-oily or gray water and oily or black water. Gray water comes from showers, sinks, the galley and laundry facilities. Black water is sewage and bilge water. Currently, the ships have collection and holding tanks (CHTs), and they either discharge the waste three nautical miles out to sea with a salt water flush or they pay to have it off-loaded when they are in port, explained Tina Lerke, a member of the gray-water research group. She added that some vessels now have a vacuum CHT that uses low levels of fresh water for the flush. However, she said, “Because you can only hold so much waste in a tank, it is becoming a problem onboard.”

One of the current projects is called the developmental gray water treatment unit. It is run in the liquid waste lab at Carderock and also on the USS Bonhomme Richard, an amphibious assault vessel, for a 15-month evaluation. The unit is a membrane bioreactor. A membrane—made up of hollow fibers that look like spaghetti—is immersed in the bioreactor. “A vacuum is pulled from the interior of the membranes, providing the driving force for the liquid to flow through the membrane and into the center of the hollow tube leaving the solids behind in the bioreactor,” explained Lerke. In the bioreactor, organisms that are naturally present are aerated and allowed to grow, and they dispose of the solid waste left behind. Everything also is treated with ultraviolet light.

The unit is made-up of three tanks, Lerke said. The first is the equalization tank. “It equalizes the volume so that you always have a certain volume in here to run the reactors. There’s not going to be a high point and a low point ... for different loadings of wastes and for temperature. We also start to aerate it here. We give it oxygen to get the bacteria growing, to keep it moving, to keep it mixed.”

The second tank is the bioreactor, and the third tank is to contain the overflow of foam that is created by the bioreactor. Lerke said, “Foam is a common problem in different kinds of bioreactors. It is especially tricky here, because you can’t use chemicals to treat [the water] onboard for safety and logistical reasons.” The unit in the lab currently is running with a 40-to-1 volume reduction.

Mike Kelly, part of the oily water team, has been working on a new system for the filtration of bilge water. According to Kelly, the primary system now onboard ships is 20-year-old technology. It basically consists of a box that contains parallel plates. As the bilge water flows into the box the parallel plates make everything slow down, so the oil has time to rise to the top. It is then separated and placed in a holding tank. The “clean” water is discharged overboard only if it shows an oil content of less than 15 parts-per-million.

If it is too high, it is fed back through the process until it meets the requirement. A problem arises when detergent used to clean the bilge ends up in the mix. “You get a really stable emulsion in there, and when you fire it into the box, it goes right on through. So the end result is a higher oil concentration in the discharge,” explained Kelly.

The new system also uses membranes. The bilge water is run through cartridges containing ceramic ultrafiltration membranes that are made up of tiny holes in a grid formation. The oil molecules are too big to permeate the wall of the membrane, but the water molecules pass through and empty into a trough outside the casing. Then it is discharged overboard, and the oil is stored for later disposal.

There is a large system that has 12 cartridges and can run 50 gallons of water a minute running in the lab. Results have been very good, Kelly said. Smaller systems that run 10 gallons a minute and have three cartridges have been tested onboard two ships, one for about two years. According to Kelly, now researchers are looking for an amphibious vessel to begin an extended evaluation of the larger system in September.

To reduce the amount of hazardous waste material off-loaded from ships, the engineers at Carderock turned to commercial-off-the-shelf technology, according to Drew Jackson, an environmental engineer. “We are looking at the shipboard problems and what we can do with this hazardous material. We look at what they use, where they use it, what ideas they had, what might facilitate and possible substitutions of equipment or material or a process, in order to reduce the amount of hazardous material they deal with.”

One of the premises of the program, he said, was to ensure that investments offered a payback within approximately three years. Once a solution was found, they worked with the vendors to make modifications in the land-based units to facilitate use aboard ships.

One example is a top-loading parts washer. Various models were tested aboard a destroyer. New features were added based on suggestions from the sailors. For instance, the access panel was moved to the front to make maintenance easier.

One of the biggest problems cited was the state of most ships’ paint lockers. Paint dispensers were developed to cut back on the mess. “The 25-gallon tank holds paint, using a pneumatic pump to re-circulate it, keep it mixed, then, like a soda fountain, the sailor can dispense it in just the amount he/she needs. Frequently what we found was paint was being returned in excess quantities than what the job required,” said Jackson.

Other equipment that has been developed are paint gun cleaners, a system that makes cleaning up paint chips easier, an explosion vacuum for fuel spills, maintenance free batteries and a medical waste processor. “Basically, [everything is] low tech and low cost, but the pay off is really high,” said Mary Jo Bieberich, another member of the hazardous waste team.

  Bookmark and Share