Twitter Facebook Google RSS
 
Naval Forces 

Navy SEALS Choose Knight’s SR25 Sniper Rifle 

10  2,000 

by Virginia Hart Ezell 

After five years of shopping for a new weapon, the U.S. Navy SEALs took the plunge and adopted the 7.62 x 51 mm SR25 sniper rifle, made by Knight’s Armament Company, of Vero Beach, Fla., and stirred the precision rifle market in the process.

The Navy let a sole source contract for 300 weapons, in May 2000, after type classifying the weapon and assigning it an official national stock number. Now referred to as the Mk 11 Mod 0, the stock number signifies not just the SR25 rifle but indicates a full weapon system, including the rifle, a Leopold scope, back-up pop-up iron sights and a lightweight military match suppressor.

The SR25 is a familiar weapon within the civilian precision rifle market. It began as a combination of design ideas from the AR-10 and AR-15 rifles, and uses “over 60 percent of existing M-16 parts” in its construction, according to company literature. More than 3,000 units have been sold to civilian shooters since the rifle was first produced in the early 1990s.

Most of Knight’s customers prefer the 24-inch barrel version that outsells other versions at a rate of 9 to 1. It is the only version that the company would guarantee for an out-of-the-box accuracy of less than one minute of angle at 100 yards. The longer barrel version has been popular among civilian marksmen, but at 44 inches, it was too long for military operations. With the suppressor attached, the weapon was 50 inches long.

Designers at Knight’s Armament changed the 24-inch barrel of the commercial version to its 20-inch barrel version to meet the SEALs’ requirements for a weapon better suited for urban combat. Although this would appear a simple conversion, an exchange of one barrel for another, Knight’s engineers knew the 20-inch version was not as accurate as the 24-inch barrel one. They needed to make changes behind the barrel to deliver the same accuracy of the longer version.

When the SR25 was first under development, Eugene Stoner, who originated the idea for the rifle, said he wanted combat soldiers to have the quality of a match rifle without needing a convoy of gunsmiths with them to maintain accuracy. Engineers at Knight’s knew there were changes in store if they wanted to maintain that level of quality when they changed the barrel length. The shorter barrel version was inherently less accurate than the longer barrel.

Improving the barrel would not improve the performance of the weapon, because precision is a function of the barrel in combination with the other working parts according to a company spokesman. All of the moving parts behind the barrel would need adjustment.

The new 20-inch barrel SR25 is not the same rifle as the one produced three years ago according to a company representative. The firing pin, ejector, extractor and buffer were changed to achieve the same level of accuracy as the weapon with the 24-inch barrel.

The result of the changes that ultimately led to the contract award means more than delivering a match quality rifle to a few Navy SEALs.

Knight’s Armament makes all of the parts for the SR25, except the barrel, in house. The company uses Obermeyer barrels in all of its SR25 variants. The shorter barrel meant they had to re-engineer manufacturing of the moving parts of the rifle to a higher standard to transfer the level of accuracy in the more forgiving 24-inch barrel version to the shorter barrel version. Those changes will have an effect on the way Knight’s produces all other SR25 rifles, which makes the project a classic example of the influences the civilian and military markets have on each other.

Knight’s Armament expects the contract to lead to further sales in the commercial and military markets. The company credits a recent sale to the U.S. Army Rangers to its Navy contract. Civilian consumers will see the changes in commercially available versions of the same weapon.

Ironically, the SR25 began as a military project, but was sustained in the development process by commercial sales. With no government funding to support the research and development of the weapon, Knight’s sold the weapons in the highly competitive, high end of the commercial gun trade. Although a company spokesman indicated the precision rifle market might already be saturated, he said the company was confident that the recent changes to the weapon, combined with the government “seal of approval,” would have a positive affect on commercial and military sales.

As a weapon with a federal stock number assigned, company representatives said the weapon now qualifies as an official national match category weapon. Competitors will likely begin to see the SR25 at the National Match at Camp Perry, in Ohio.

The National Rifle Association is scheduled to consider a proposal to include the SR25 in the service rifle competition in the National Matches, a move that would place it with the M-16 and other rifles in military service. Military teams including the Navy Marksmanship team would likely use it in the competition.

The SR25 originated to meet a perceived future military requirement for a new 7.62 x 51 mm sniper rifle. It was built around existing AR-10 and AR-15 designs. As a private venture, Knight’s Armament sustained the project through commercial sales while it provided test models for potential military customers patiently waiting for a positive response.

Feedback from the military customers led to engineering changes and improvements that ultimately affect the civilian model—and the evolution of small arms design.

Virginia Hart Ezell is president of the Institute for Research on Small Arms in International Security and a reserve Army major in the Ordnance Corps.



Bookmark and Share
Submit Your Reader's Comment Below
*Name
 
*eMail
 
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
*Comments
 
 
Refresh
Please enter the text displayed in the image.
The picture contains 6 characters.
*Characters
  
*Legal Notice

NDIA is not responsible for screening, policing, editing, or monitoring your or another user's postings and encourages all of its users to use reasonable discretion and caution in evaluating or reviewing any posting. Moreover, and except as provided below with respect to NDIA's right and ability to delete or remove a posting (or any part thereof), NDIA does not endorse, oppose, or edit any opinion or information provided by you or another user and does not make any representation with respect to, nor does it endorse the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or reliability of any advice, opinion, statement, or other material displayed, uploaded, or distributed by you or any other user. Nevertheless, NDIA reserves the right to delete or take other action with respect to postings (or parts thereof) that NDIA believes in good faith violate this Legal Notice and/or are potentially harmful or unlawful. If you violate this Legal Notice, NDIA may, in its sole discretion, delete the unacceptable content from your posting, remove or delete the posting in its entirety, issue you a warning, and/or terminate your use of the NDIA site. Moreover, it is a policy of NDIA to take appropriate actions under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and other applicable intellectual property laws. If you become aware of postings that violate these rules regarding acceptable behavior or content, you may contact NDIA at 703.522.1820.

 
 
  Bookmark and Share